If there is to be no millineum.......

End Times
User avatar
_AARONDISNEY
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:39 pm
Location: southernINDIANA

Post by _AARONDISNEY » Mon May 22, 2006 7:20 pm

Ice doesn't have any audio like Steve though does he? :cry:
That stinks!!!

I've been listening to Robert L. Dean, Jr. for a little while...a little more impressive than most of them, but he sounds like a meanie!! He called pentecostals nitwits on there!! I'm pentecostal so that didn't sit real well, but if you want to try him out, Ely, here's his link. It's 29 dispensational lectures...
http://deanbible.org/andromeda.php?q=f& ... pensations
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_Ely
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:28 pm
Location: UK

Post by _Ely » Mon May 22, 2006 7:22 pm

Who else? Umm, Jack Van Impe? Paul & Jan Crouch? (ok, now I'm being cruel!)
:shock: :lol:
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
"Looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Saviour, Christ Jesus" Titus 2:13
www.lasttrumpet.com
www.pfrs.org

_Ely
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:28 pm
Location: UK

Post by _Ely » Mon May 22, 2006 7:32 pm

Ice doesn't have any audio like Steve though does he?
That stinks!!!

I've been listening to Robert L. Dean, Jr. for a little while...a little more impressive than most of them, but he sounds like a meanie!! He called pentecostals nitwits on there!! I'm pentecostal so that didn't sit real well, but if you want to try him out, Ely, here's his link. It's 29 dispensational lectures...
http://deanbible.org/andromeda.php?q=f& ... pensations
Thanks Aaron, I'll check him out.

bless God.

Ely
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
"Looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Saviour, Christ Jesus" Titus 2:13
www.lasttrumpet.com
www.pfrs.org

User avatar
_Mort_Coyle
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:28 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by _Mort_Coyle » Tue May 23, 2006 12:50 am

Aaron, I just saw your earlier post where your quoted some verses from Romans and Revelation. It's ironic since in my post just prior to that I had written to Ely:
This is a major theme of Paul's letter to the Romans (if you read it as a complete letter and not just cherry-picked verses).
I probably won't be able to respond to the verses you posted at any length until tomorrow evening, but in the meantime, I'd encourage you to read the entire letter to the Romans and look at the theme that Paul develops and builds through the epistle regarding the question of "who is Israel?".
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Tue May 23, 2006 3:58 am

Ely wrote:
The true Israel is believing Jews and grafted in Gentiles, all supported by the same root. As such, the Gentiles didn't replace the Jews, they joined the believing Jews to become the people of God.
This is where we depart form one another. I'm yet to be convinced that Gentiles become Israelites through faith in God. I never see Gentiles referred to as Jews Israelites in the NT. In Galatians 6:16 (Israel of God), Romans 2:27-29 (inward Jews) and Philippians 3:3 (the circumcision "who worship God in the spirit") Paul is referring to physical Jews who are believers in Jesus.

I'm still looking into Galatians 3, but my present thoughts are that when Gentiles are called Abraham's 'seed' (and when Abraham is called our 'father' in Romans 4) this is showing that we are partakers of the promise given in Genesis that Abraham would be the father of many nations and that many nations would be blessed in him. I don't see the need to understand this to mean that Gentiles are 'spiritual Jews.' But like I said, give me some time to consider this por favor.

Ely
Can I ask, what is the definition of a Jew?

Also, I'm wondering how you can say that Phil 3:3 isn't directed at Christians when Paul says "we" are the true circumcision.

He goes on to say (in Phil 3) that although he is of Jewish descent he counts is all as "loss" to be found in Christ. In other words, the greater is to be "in Christ", the "rubbish" Paul is referring to is his heritage as a Jew.

I would like a good commentary on Ephesians 1-3 as pertaining to the Church being Jew and Gentile.

It seems as if Paul is going through great pains to explain that the Gentiles who: "being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world." who once were far off have been brought near.

Gentiles have been brought near to what?

For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation.

What does Paul mean, has made both one? If Gentiles were far off from Israel, and have now not only been brought near but "made one", what on earth else can that mean that the obvious?

having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace

That "one new man" is the body of Christ, the Church. Of whom Jesus is the head (Eph 1:22-23)

When a Jew becomes a Christian, he's not considered a "super Jew" because he's saved (a apposed to being "just" a Christian). Remember what Paul thought about his heritage, compared to Christ.

Now, therefore, you are no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God

Now what did Paul say the Gentiles were not citizens of? Israel

being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers

But not anymore, Gentiles are no longer strangers and foreigners but "fellow citizens" with the saints and members of the household of God.

having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief cornerstone, in whom the whole building, being fitted together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord, in whom you also are being built together for a dwelling place of God in the Spirit.

That's a picture of the Church, aka true Israel. Christ is the King of the Jews, the King of Israel.

Revelation 21 says the bride of Christ is the heavenly Jerusalem. As does Paul in Galatians 4.

I don't see a seperation of Jew and Gentile in the Church, I see unity.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

User avatar
_AARONDISNEY
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:39 pm
Location: southernINDIANA

Post by _AARONDISNEY » Tue May 23, 2006 11:07 am

Mort_Coyle wrote:Aaron, I just saw your earlier post where your quoted some verses from Romans and Revelation. It's ironic since in my post just prior to that I had written to Ely:
This is a major theme of Paul's letter to the Romans (if you read it as a complete letter and not just cherry-picked verses).
I probably won't be able to respond to the verses you posted at any length until tomorrow evening, but in the meantime, I'd encourage you to read the entire letter to the Romans and look at the theme that Paul develops and builds through the epistle regarding the question of "who is Israel?".
Hello Mort,
I don't believe that I was just cherry picking. I believe (as far as I can tell) that in this age there is no difference. God isn't dealing with national Israel apart from us. The middle wall has been brought down, but I don't believe that we are the Israel of God, or that we are the Jews spoken of in Revelation 3:9. I believe that what He was speaking of was His Jewish remnant that followed Him as He intended.

Romans main theme that I can see is from chapters 1-3 we are all the same, Jew or Gentile, in need of a Savior and sinful beings, no matter who we are. Jews can't look down on Gentiles and say that they are sinners above all sinners because as 2:1 says - the man that judges does the same thing.

Ch. 4 spoke about how Abraham was not in God's grace because of what he did, but because of the faith he had in God. How that prior to his circumcision he was counted righteous because of his faith.

Ch. 5 - Speaks once again of our need for a Savior, because in Adam, we were all infected (Jew or Gentile) with the sin nature.

Chs 6-8 - The believers relationship to sin. How it is to be no longer our master. The law came to show us how sinful we are - and how we needed Jesus to deliver us from the body of this death!!- Now in Jesus we can walk in victory over sin and no longer be condemned.

Chs 9-11 Paul wishes that his people (according to the flesh) would understand their need for Jesus, for not all that are of Israel are true Israel...The true Israel of God is the faithful remnant. So He has also included Gentiles into His gospel and sent the message throughout the world that salvation is of Jesus Christ. We as Gentiles are wild branches and the national Jew is the natural branch. We have been grafted in against nature.

Ch 12-16 (various instructions to Godly living)

I've made this very simplified, but I don't see a dominant theme of all believers becoming Israel. Can you specifically show me how this is the major theme of Romans?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_AARONDISNEY
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:39 pm
Location: southernINDIANA

Post by _AARONDISNEY » Tue May 23, 2006 2:13 pm

Okay - I've got a question real quick.
Someone brought this text up to me.

Isa 11:11-13
11 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the Lord shall set his hand again the second time to recover the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria, and from Egypt, and from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, and from Shinar, and from Hamath, and from the islands of the sea.
12 And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.
13 The envy also of Ephraim shall depart, and the adversaries of Judah shall be cut off: Ephraim shall not envy Judah, and Judah shall not vex Ephraim.
(KJV)

It is said that God will regather the remnant of his people a second time.
From what I understand, they were dispersed when God judged them and sent the northern tribes into Assyria and the southern tribes into Babylon. So upon their return from their return from dispersion, that was the first time He regathered them. The second dispersion was in 70AD and they have (and are still being) regathered.

If you call this second regathering a spiritualized Christian regathering, when was the first Christian dispersion and regathering and second Christian dispersion?

I can't hardly figure out a spiritualization of this passage. Maybe I'm not looking deep enough.

Aaron
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Allyn
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Nebraska

Post by _Allyn » Tue May 23, 2006 4:29 pm

No, I believe the first time was the exodus and the 2nd time the babylonian exile.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_AARONDISNEY
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:39 pm
Location: southernINDIANA

Post by _AARONDISNEY » Tue May 23, 2006 4:34 pm

Allyn wrote:No, I believe the first time was the exodus and the 2nd time the babylonian exile.
I thought that might be the case too, Allyn, but what you are suggesting is that the second time he did this is referring to the return from Babylonian captivity, and so it has to be as described.

When He brought them back from Babylonian captivity did he....recover the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria, and from Egypt, and from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, and from Shinar, and from Hamath, and from the islands of the sea.

I don't believe that He did so we have to look for another explanation here don't we?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Allyn
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Nebraska

Post by _Allyn » Tue May 23, 2006 4:45 pm

Why don't you believe He did so?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

Post Reply

Return to “Eschatology”