Selah wrote:Well brothers, would you help me out here because that is what I meant.

Can you explain how the computer prediction is not rational?
The computer prediction is neither rational nor irrational. It's your CHOICE which is either rational or irrational. True, I think that choosing both boxes is the rational choice. That's because I'm a class B thinker. A class A thinker believes opening only Box A is the rational choice.
It seems to be because if it is correct 500 analyses out of reading 500 brainwave sets, then it might be right when it predicts my choice. (Even tossing a coin never gets that good; you would never get 500 "heads" or "tails" consecutively, or randomly). So if it "knows" that I would want to open both boxes, the result would be that $100 is put in box A and $100 in box B. Okay, what is wrong with my rationale?
What's the difference what the computer predicted? The money is already there! If you open both boxes, you get to keep what is in both boxes. If you open only Box A, you get to keep only what is in Box A. (What I have just expressed is typical Class B thinking)
Thank you for telling me in kindness.

Michelle, according to Paidion, you have aced the "test." Maybe you can set me strait.
It wasn't a test ---- except in the sense that it possibly assessed the type of thinker you are.
And Michelle didn't "ace" anything. She just happens to agree with me that opening both boxes is the rational choice.