Ok. This is too much drivel (*) but it shows that some sort of question arose on Sunday and Sabbath with Luther. Still the fact that Luther's doctrine wasn't perfect is not a surprise. I haven't met anyone with perfect doctrine.RND wrote:Sabbath Truth Presented, But Rejected by Luther
Almost unknown to most Christian literature is the name of Andreas Rudolph B. Carlstadt, the great apostle of the seventh day Sabbath. He was born in Carlstadt, Bavaria, in 1480 and died in Basel, Switzerland, on December 25, 1541, at the age of 61 years. Carlstadt was a personal friend and co-worker with Martin Luther but strenuously opposed him on the Sabbath issue. Carlstadt observed the seventh day Sabbath and taught its observance. D'Aubigne says that Luther himself admitted that Carlstadt was his superior in learning (Fifield's History. Reference book ten, page 315).
The rejection of the Sabbath at the Council of Trent at once crippled the advance of the Reformation. Protestants and Protestant reformers will be held responsible on Judgment Day for their unfaithfulness at a time when the entire Roman Church pivoted toward discarding all tradition.
Now the quote of the article above shows an obvious violation of New Testament teaching in that the author appears to be a judge of the Law. The author of your article has made a judgment on God's servants. How did he get that special privilege?
I think you need to reconsider your general viewpoint.Rom 14:4 wrote: Who are you who judge another’s servant? To his own lord he stands or falls. Yes, he will be made to stand, for God has power to make him stand.
Note: (*) --the original basketball term located here was replaced with a word meaning "nonsense"