Romans 7: Who is the "I"? Before or After?

The "I" in Romans 7 refers to:

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
_Rick_C
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:14 am
Location: West Central Ohio

Post by _Rick_C » Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:51 pm

Hello Homer
Among other things, you wrote:And no, our "sin nature" does not disappear.
I posted last summer that: I do not believe the Bible teaches Christians have a "sinful nature"...but what else is new? Not much, other than I'm coming along in my Romans 7 study.

I might start a thread on the chapter and/or something related to it. As I posted with Sean; I think the most difficult thing about this chapter is following Paul's train of thought.

Not to debate about it or anything...well, maybe I should just start a new thread?
Take care,
Rick
Last edited by _Rich on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
“In Jesus Christ God ordained life for man, but death for himself” -- Karl Barth

_STEVE7150
Posts: 894
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 8:38 pm

Post by _STEVE7150 » Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:23 pm

The question is this: is a born-again Christian a "slave of sin" or has he been set free? I think the scripture is decidedly in favor of the latter. No slave of sin could say "I can do all things through Christ who strengthen me."


Homer, Of course a Christian is not a slave to sin since our master is Christ but the issue as i understood it was whether Paul was speaking of himself in the present tense or in the past tense.
In Gal 5.17 Paul says "For the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit , and the desires of the Spirit are against the flesh, for these are opposed to each other , to keep you from doing the things you want to do."
This seems to be the crux of Romans 7 , this tension between flesh and Spirit but "Wretched man that i am, who will deliver me from this body of death? Thanks be to God through Christ Jesus our Lord" Rom 7.25
There it is, a present tension but a deliverance through Christ. But this tension is a reality for virtually every believer and IMO Paul is speaking of this present tension.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_Michelle
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by _Michelle » Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:41 pm

Rick,

I, for one, would be very interested in reading a verse by verse interpretation of this chapter...just in case popular demand might convince you to start that new thread.

MM
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Rick_C
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:14 am
Location: West Central Ohio

Post by _Rick_C » Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:55 pm

P.S., Homer
You wrote:Yes we still have a battle to be won. As Paul indicated, we need to beat our body into submission, and also our mind. "____________ " (the "sin nature" sentences, and how it is "not the point"). The question is this: is a born-again Christian a "slave of sin" or has he been set free? I think the scripture is decidedly in favor of the latter. No slave of sin could say "I can do all things through Christ who strengthen me."
Other than my disagreement that Christians (even) "have a sinful nature", which I posted before: Amen!

Btw, I'm gathering more info & don't know when, or if, I'll start a thread here. Recently, I found this quoted on a blog, which may be of interest:
Re: Romans 7:13-25, Jacobus Arminius wrote: Wherefore, from the 24th verse, when rightly understood, I argue thus for the establishment of my own opinion: Those men who are placed under grace are not wretched; But this man is wretched; Therefore, this man is not placed under grace. He who desires to be delivered from the body of this death, that is, from the dominion and tyranny of sin, is not placed under grace, but under the law. But this man desires to be delivered from the dominion and tyranny of sin; therefore, this man is not placed under grace, but under the law. The proposition is true, because regenerate men, and those who are placed under grace, are free from the servitude and tyranny of sin. (emphasis mine).
I don't know where this quote is Arminius's writings but will look later (to get the entire context, as per usual when doing any kind of hermeneutics!). Bible, in context! Arminius (and everyone else), the same!

I also can't tell if Arminius thought the "I" was "a Jew under the law and before becoming a Christian" (as I believe). I'll have to follow-up on this later....

Btw, I'm considering "becoming" a Methodist, (joining The United Methodist Church)...and disagree with Wesley's interpretation of this passage. But the Methodists allow for differences of opinion on many theological matters. Wesley, Wesleyans, and many Calvinists for that matter, think Paul's "I" is talking about "(present time) Christian sanctification". I disagree.

However, I still embrace the Wesleyan emphasis on personal holiness (though I don't accept the extreme forms of it, as with those who believe in entire (permanent) sanctification; that you can "never sin again").

Anyways, God bless,
Rick
Last edited by _Rich on Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:59 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Reason:
“In Jesus Christ God ordained life for man, but death for himself” -- Karl Barth

User avatar
_Rick_C
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:14 am
Location: West Central Ohio

Post by _Rick_C » Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:04 pm

Hi Michelle, we simul-posted :)

My blog...has been basically "dead" since Jan. 7th. One guy posted to me on some questions I had re: the A/G. No new posts since, tho. Among other things, I've been "offline" more lately, and am getting more involved with church activities....

I, too, would like to see a verse-by-verse interpretation that stays in the chapter (and they are really hard to find). I've found many, many articles, posts on forums and blogs, have read a few commentaries on the passage, had a class in Romans in college (my prof., A/G, believed the "I" was both past and present tense), and....

If I wind up doing a study on my blog, it will move really slow. In the meantime, I may post here to get some precursory ideas, input, and to "brain-storm".

Anyways, feel free to PM me any time & gtsy! :wink:
Rick
Last edited by _Rich on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
“In Jesus Christ God ordained life for man, but death for himself” -- Karl Barth

User avatar
_Rick_C
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:14 am
Location: West Central Ohio

Post by _Rick_C » Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:03 pm

*bump*
I wrote:I, too, would like to see a verse-by-verse interpretation that stays in the chapter (and they are really hard to find)....
Eureka!!!!

I googled the above quote from Arminius I posted and, to my surprise:
ARMINIUS DOES IT (for as far as I have read so far, imo)....

A few years ago, I had seen he wrote on Romans 7 but never read it. And I falsely assumed he would be in agreement with Wesley on this, which he is not (and this was one reason I never read it): DUH.

Here's a link (for now, scroll down to):
DISSERTATION OF THE TRUE AND GENUINE SENSE OF THE SEVENTH CHAPTER OF ST. PAUL'S LETTER TO THE ROMANS:
by Jacobus (James) Arminius


This is entirely awesome!!!!
I'm just posting this now for anyone (like Michelle?) who may want to read it.
The quote comes from Romans 7:24 (VERSE THE TWENTY-FOURTH)...right by where you see the number 337. This is a good part to read as it is a summary. Here's a a snippet:
Arminius wrote:Wherefore, from the 24th verse, when rightly understood, I argue thus for the establishment of my own opinion:

Those men who are placed under grace are not wretched; But this man is wretched;

Therefore, this man is not placed under grace.

The assumption is in the text, and thus placed beyond all controversy.

In reference to the proposition, perhaps some one will say, "Men, placed under grace, are partly blessed, and partly wretched — blessed, as they are regenerate and partakers of the grace of Christ — wretched, as they still have within them the remains of sin, with which they ought to maintain a constant warfare. This is a sure sign of a felicity which is not yet full and perfect." I confess that, while the regenerate continue as sojourners in this mortal life, they do not attain to a felicity that is full, complete in all its parts, and perfect. But I do not recollect ever to have read [in the Scriptures] that they are, on this account, called "wretched" with regard to the "spiritual life which they live by faith of the Son of God," though, in reference to this natural life, "they be of all men most miserable." (1 Corinthians 15:19.) The opposite to this may be easily proved from the Scriptures: "Blessed are the poor in spirit — they that mourn — that hunger and thirst after righteousness," etc. (Matthew 5:3-12.)

"But," some one will rejoin, "Is it not wretched to contend with the remains of sin, to be buffeted by the messenger of Satan, sometimes to be overcome, and to be grievously injured?" It is undoubtedly desirable that this were not necessary, that it never occurred, that they might be delivered from the messenger of Satan; but the contenders, and those who are thus buffeted, cannot be called "wretched" on account of that contest and buffeting. But it is wretched indeed, to be overcome; yet neither are they called "wretched," who, though they be sometimes conquered, more frequently obtain the victory over the world, sin and Satan.


One comment.
1 Co 15 (NIV)
9If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are to be pitied more than all men.


Arminius didn't "post" the first part of the verse. But his reference to "in natural life" covers it (that would be to say, if we only had the natural, if Christ was not raised).


New thread soon, I hope, :wink:
(any feedback in the meantime, welcomed)
Rick
Last edited by _Rich on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
“In Jesus Christ God ordained life for man, but death for himself” -- Karl Barth

User avatar
_Homer
Posts: 639
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Brownsville

Post by _Homer » Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:32 pm

Rick,
Among other things, you wrote:
And no, our "sin nature" does not disappear.


I posted last summer that: I do not believe the Bible teaches Christians have a "sinful nature"...
Me neither! :oops: I must have been tired (searching for an excuse) or perhaps my old, little used NIV leaped out of a hidden closet in my mind! I should have said "flesh".
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
A Berean

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:22 am

Paul did call himself the chief of sinners. That's pretty bad. :)

1Ti 1:15 This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief.

He didn't say he was, but "I am" chief. Wouldn't the chief of sinners be "wretched"?

Just a thought.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

User avatar
_Paidion
Posts: 944
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:42 pm
Location: Chapple, Ontario

Post by _Paidion » Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:11 pm

Sean wrote:He didn't say he was, but "I am" chief. Wouldn't the chief of sinners be "wretched"?
This use of the present tense does not imply that Paul continued in sin, and continued to be "the chief of sinners."

There is no doubt that Paul's referent here is his persecution of Christians before his regeneration.

We often talk that way today. Someone may say, "Joe Bloe is a murderer," because Joe murdered someone 40 years ago. But 39 years ago, Joe became a disciple of Christ. Since that time he has never murdered. Yet, it is said that "Joe is a murderer" because of that one act of murder. However, such a statement does not describe Joe's present state of behaviour.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Paidion
Avatar --- Age 45
"Not one soul will ever be redeemed from hell but by being saved from his sins, from the evil in him." --- George MacDonald

_Sean
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Smithton, IL

Post by _Sean » Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:25 am

Paidion wrote:
Sean wrote:He didn't say he was, but "I am" chief. Wouldn't the chief of sinners be "wretched"?
This use of the present tense does not imply that Paul continued in sin, and continued to be "the chief of sinners."

There is no doubt that Paul's referent here is his persecution of Christians before his regeneration.
I didn't mean to imply that I thought Paul still was the chief of sinners. ;)
It was a reply to Rick's post form Arminius:
I confess that, while the regenerate continue as sojourners in this mortal life, they do not attain to a felicity that is full, complete in all its parts, and perfect. But I do not recollect ever to have read [in the Scriptures] that they are, on this account, called "wretched" with regard to the "spiritual life which they live by faith of the Son of God
Paidion, it seems that one could read the same meaning you gave to Paul's statement "Chief of sinners" as being past tense into his "I" statements from Romans 7.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. (John 13:35)

Post Reply

Return to “Miscellaneous”