There are three creeds which are apparently, the bedcrock of orthodox Trinitarian Christian theology: the Nicene, the Chalcedon and Athanasian. Look at what they say about the second person of the Trinity. (from: http://www.crivoice.org/creedsearly.htm ... s'%20Creed )
Nicene Creed (325)
[Lord, Jesus Christ] came down from heaven; by the power of the Holy Spirit he became incarnate from the Virgin Mary, and was made truly human.
Chalcedon (451)
[Lord Jesus Christ] is perfect both in deity and in humanness; this selfsame one is also actually God and actually man, with a rational soul and a body. He is of the same reality as God as far as his deity is concerned and of the same reality as we ourselves as far as his humanness is concerned; thus like us in all respects, sin only excepted
Now, all these creeds state with unanimity that the second person is fully man and fully God at the same time. From the incarnation, he now has "two natures" - one nature is fully divine, the other nature is fully human. I assume that most people here would agree with this.The Athanasian Creed
It is furthermore necessary for eternal salvation truly to believe that our Lord Jesus Christ also took on human flesh. Now this is the true Christian faith: We believe and confess, that our Lord Jesus Christ, God's Son, is both God and Man... he is man, born in time from the nature of his mother, fully God, fully man, with rational soul and human flesh, equal to the Father, as to his deity, less than the Father, as to his humanity; and though he is both God and Man, Christ is not two persons but one, one, not by changing the deity into flesh, but by taking the humanity into God; one, indeed, not by mixture of the natures, but by unity in one person.
So, my question concerns the "human nature" of the logos. Is there any ontological difference between his human nature/humanity/humanness and our human nature/humanity/humanness?