How many Calvinists/Arminians do we have?

Are you a Calvinist or Arminian?

Poll ended at Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:01 pm

 
Total votes: 0

_roblaine
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Post by _roblaine » Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:46 am

21centpilgrim wrote:Rom 8 speaks to this

vs 29-30 "For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among the bretheren;and those He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified."

"Those ", means that some are not predestined. So obviously not everyone is predestined.
Perhaps those He predestined, were those that freely chose to follow Christ. Those who are not predestined, would be anyone who rejects the light God gave them. As 2 Peter 3:9 says

The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.

It seems God would desire that all fall into the predestined category, but some freely choose darkness over light.

Robin
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
God Bless

_PAULESPINO
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:53 pm

Post by _PAULESPINO » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:20 am

Romans 8

English: Foreknow
Greek:Proginosko
Definition: to have knowledge before hand, to predestinate

It is obvious that God foreknew us because He is our creator.
It is obvious that God have knowledge about us before hand because he planned our creation.
We have a relationship with God even before we were created. And this type of a relationship is called designer, raw materials relationship.
God as the designer and humans as the raw materials.
I know that John MacArthur argues that we have a relationship with God before he creates us but he assumed that the type of relationship we have with God is creator, saved relationship which is not true because we were not created yet we were still on the drawing board.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_PAULESPINO
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:53 pm

Post by _PAULESPINO » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:38 am

Devin, you are confusing free will with the finished works of Christ on the cross. Adam and Eve were already given the free will even before the fall. Christ is the one who initiates our salvation by his death and ressurection.
Now if decided to follow Christ but there is no Christ can I still be save? The answer is no, because the salvation for humankind has not yet been initiated by Christ. But if I chose to follow Christ and he has initiated our salvation through his death and ressurection can I be save?
The answer is yes therefore did I initiate my salvation by choosing Christ of course not.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_PAULESPINO
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:53 pm

Post by _PAULESPINO » Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:01 am

The basis of the "doctrine of election" is philosophy therefore to counter this idea is to use philosophy also.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Allyn
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Nebraska

Post by _Allyn » Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:25 am

I am new to this discussion and even though I should, I am not going to read back. I have always believed that people have been predestined to do one thing and that is to walk in the likeness of Christ. Not all will do this, of course, but the saved can and do, thus God's truth of predestination comes about by the fact that in order to be a child of God one must follow after the provider of that trust and that trust lies in Christ alone.

Romans 8:28-30 (New King James Version)

28 And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose. 29 For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified.


Ephesians 1:4-6 (New King James Version)

4 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love, 5 having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, 6 to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He made us accepted in the Beloved.

Ephesians 1:10-12 (New King James Version)

10 that in the dispensation of the fullness of the times He might gather together in one all things in Christ, both[a] which are in heaven and which are on earth—in Him. 11 In Him also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestined according to the purpose of Him who works all things according to the counsel of His will, 12 that we who first trusted in Christ should be to the praise of His glory.


Being a foreknown one and being predestined is not the same term but to be predestined can only be applied to the one foreknown.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_21centpilgrim
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:47 pm
Location: portland, OR

Post by _21centpilgrim » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:34 pm

PAULESPINO Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 10:20 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Romans 8

English: Foreknow
Greek:Proginosko
Definition: to have knowledge before hand, to predestinate

It is obvious that God foreknew us because He is our creator.
It is obvious that God have knowledge about us before hand because he planned our creation.
We have a relationship with God even before we were created. And this type of a relationship is called designer, raw materials relationship.
God as the designer and humans as the raw materials.
I know that John MacArthur argues that we have a relationship with God before he creates us but he assumed that the type of relationship we have with God is creator, saved relationship which is not true because we were not created yet we were still on the drawing board.


Paulespino,

Just as there are those whom God did not predestine there are those whom He did not foreknow. This makes sense when we understand that foreknowledge is not talking about things we are going to do but His chosing to love us beforehand. "Those He foreknew" not what He foreknew about those people, and as "knowing" is asociated with intimacy throughout scripture I feel we can jstuly say that foreknowledge is choosing to love beforehand.
[/quote]
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
"The goal of theology is the worship of God
The posture of theology is on ones knees
The mode of theology is repentance."
Sinclair Ferguson

User avatar
_Paidion
Posts: 944
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:42 pm
Location: Chapple, Ontario

Post by _Paidion » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:47 pm

English: Foreknow
Greek:Proginosko
We get the English "prognosis" from this word. When a medical doctor comes up with a prognosis, he doesn't have "foreknowledge". He doesn't know what will happen with the patient. But he has a sound prediction based on his knowledge of the patient's health.

The word translated as "predestination" ought rather to be translated as "pre-appointment." God has appointed people beforehand. But not everyone will keep that appointment.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Paidion
Avatar --- Age 45
"Not one soul will ever be redeemed from hell but by being saved from his sins, from the evil in him." --- George MacDonald

_PAULESPINO
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:53 pm

Post by _PAULESPINO » Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:44 pm

Paidion wrote:
The word translated as "predestination" ought rather to be translated as "pre-appointment." God has appointed people beforehand. But not everyone will keep that appointment.
Thanks Paidion also Allyn for the passages you provided.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Devin
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:51 pm
Location: Asheville, NC

Post by _Devin » Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:27 pm

roblaine wrote:
21centpilgrim wrote:Rom 8 speaks to this

vs 29-30 "For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among the bretheren;and those He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified."

"Those ", means that some are not predestined. So obviously not everyone is predestined.
Perhaps those He predestined, were those that freely chose to follow Christ. Those who are not predestined, would be anyone who rejects the light God gave them. As 2 Peter 3:9 says

The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.

It seems God would desire that all fall into the predestined category, but some freely choose darkness over light.

Robin
check out what joel barnes said about 2nd Peter 3:9

"This is surely the most popular passage cited (almost never with any reference to the context) to “prove” that God could not possibly desire to save a specific people but instead desires to save every single individual person, thereby denying election and predestination. The text seems inarguably clear. But it is always good to see a text in its own context: 2 Peter 3:3-13.
Immediately one sees that unlike such passages as Ephesians 1, Romans 8-9, or John 6, this passage is not speaking about salvation as its topic. The reference to “coming to repentance” in 2 Peter 3:9 is made in passing. The topic is the coming of Christ. In the last days mockers will question the validity of his promise. Peter is explaining the reason why the coming of Christ has been delayed as long as it has. The day of the Lord, he says, will come like a thief, and it will come at God’s own time.

But the next thing that stands out upon the reading of the passage is the clear identification of the audience to whom Peter is speaking. When speaking of the mockers he refers to them in the third person as “them.” But everywhere else he speaks directly to his audience as the “beloved” and “you.” He speaks of how his audience should behave “in holy conduct and godliness,” and says that they look for the day of the Lord. He includes himself in this group in 2 Peter 3:13, where “we are looking for a new heaven and a new earth.” This is vitally important, for the assumption made by the Arminian is that when 2 Peter 3:9 says the Lord is “patient toward you” that this “you” refers to everyone. Likewise, then, when it says “not wishing for any to perish” but “all to come to repentance,” it is assumed that the “any” and “all” refers to anyone at all of the human race. Yet, the context indicates that the audience is quite specific. In any other passage of Scripture the interpreter would realize that we must decide who the “you” refers to and use this to limit the “any” and “all” of 2 Peter 3:9. For some reason, that simple and fundamental necessity is overlooked when this passage is cited.

2 Peter 1:1-3 tells us the specific identity of the audience to whom Peter is writing. Peter writes to a specific group, not to all of mankind. “To those who have received a faith of the same kind as ours.” This surely limits the context to the saved, for they have received this faith “by the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ”. There is nothing in 2 Peter 3 that indicates a change in audience, and much to tell us the audience remains exactly the same.

Since this is so, it becomes quite clear that the Arminian is badly misusing this passage by ignoring what Peter is really saying. The patience of the Lord is displayed toward his elect people (the “you” of 2 Peter 3:9). Therefore, the “not wishing any to perish” must be limited to the same group already in view: The elect. In the same way, the “all to come to repentance” must be the very same group. In essence Peter is saying the coming of the Lord has been delayed so that all the elect of God can be gathered in. Any modern Christian lives and knows Christ solely because God’s purpose has been to gather in his election down through the ages to this present day. There is no reason to expand the context of the passage into a universal proclamation of a desire on God’s part that every single person come to repentance. Instead, it is clearly his plan and his will that all the elect come to repentance, and they most assuredly will do so."
-Joel Barnes
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
in mans attempt to become wise... they became fools

User avatar
_Devin
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:51 pm
Location: Asheville, NC

Post by _Devin » Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:32 pm

PAULESPINO wrote:Devin, you are confusing free will with the finished works of Christ on the cross. Adam and Eve were already given the free will even before the fall. Christ is the one who initiates our salvation by his death and ressurection.
Now if decided to follow Christ but there is no Christ can I still be save? The answer is no, because the salvation for humankind has not yet been initiated by Christ. But if I chose to follow Christ and he has initiated our salvation through his death and ressurection can I be save?
The answer is yes therefore did I initiate my salvation by choosing Christ of course not.
were adam and eve predestined to fall? I know that Christ initiates salvation, but from what you've said, it seems that you lay responsibility on the man for attaining their salvation, and that man acts first, then God responds, which seems that it is a "work" that we do in order to attain salvation.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
in mans attempt to become wise... they became fools

Post Reply

Return to “Calvinism, Arminianism & Open Theism”