A clear and consistent biblical response to Mr Gregg.

Post by **_Steve** » Sun May 13, 2007 6:43 pm

I have not had the time to read all of these threads on Calvinism. My impression is that, for some people, this is their big issue, and they can justify spending hours each day talking only about this one thing. I have many other interests, and responsibilities, so I often get around to some of these threads several days after the last posting (as was the case today).

I am greatly disappointed that Super Sola Scriptura did not accept my plea with him to lay off the attacks on Calvinists and on James White. I am just informing our other participants that I have followed up on my threat to him, and have banned him from the forum.

I hope this may be all that will be necessary in order to restore the Chrtistian environment that used to dominate the discussions here.

By the way, I never did get to hear Mr. White's final critique of my lectures (the one where he discussed Romans 9). He informed me of its being posted back when I was in Hawaii, but I was too busy at the time to listen to it, and determined to do so upon returning home. I have not been able to locate that webcast at his web site. Does anyone here have the link they could post for me? Thanks.

I am sure that people are still wondering whether Mr. White and I will debate. If Mr. White is still ionterested, I am. However, we have not settled any of the questions of time, place and format. I hope to be in communication with him soon to work out the details.

Post by **_Derek** » Sun May 13, 2007 7:23 pm

Steve,

I think this is it. It's the one where he addresses your comments on Act. 13.

http://www.aomin.org/index.php?itemid=1956

God bless,

Post by **_Steve** » Mon May 14, 2007 2:02 pm

Thanks, Derek!

Post by **__id_1512** » Mon May 14, 2007 4:08 pm

That was the last show in which he responded to your presentations, Steve, but it looks like he never did discuss your treatment of Romans 9. That show was on a Tuesday, and he had planned to discuss Romans 9, but for some reason he decided to go into more depth on Acts 13:48. I'm not sure if he forgot to go back and discuss Romans 9, or just decided to move on.

However, he does have a series called "Common Attacks Against Reformed Theology", available at his church's website. Four of them are devoted to Romans 9, if you want to hear his treatment. I listened to them a while back, but I don't recall how much he presents a positive case, and how much he responds to other interpretations (e.g. the national privileges interpretation).

Post by **_Steve** » Mon May 14, 2007 10:45 pm

Thanks, Jugulum. I'll get those, too.