Please accept my apologies for not replying till now.
The first was a translation, not a paraphrase, which was why I added "again" in italics:Earlier in the thread you quoted where I wrote:26 and anyone who lives again and believes in me will by no means ever die.
A Taking A Few More Liberties Paraphrase
26 and so, after anyone gets raised from the dead will they die again? Not!
And then you replied:
Rick, I was about to post a reply to suggest that we would simply have to disagree, and that your interpretation misses the point of what Jesus was saying, when I suddenly saw the reasoning in your intrerpetation. But then I realized that before I could embrace it, there would have to be a resolution of an apparent difficulty.
The two sentences you quote above as possible paraphrases appear to me to be inconsistent.
26 and anyone who lives again and believes in me will by no means ever die.
My rationale.
Jn 11(NIV)
25 Jesus said to her, "I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live {Grk, nominative case}, even though he dies;
26 and whoever lives {Grk, zhsetai, Verb: 3rd person, future tense, middle voice, indicative mood} and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?"
My italicized "again" comes from the Greek, and most especially the future tense: In other words, in verse 26 Jesus was talking about the future {tense} "life-after-death" resurrection, imo. The tense proves he was saying so, to my satisfaction....
I see the phrase "and believes in me" as qualifiying or as "the qualifier."You also wrote:If Jesus meant as the more libertarian paraphase states that anyone who gets raised from the dead will not die again, then why did He in fact add the limiting phrase "and believes in me" (as in the first paraphrase above)? If Jesus was speaking of those who live after being raised from the dead, then the fact that of His adding this limiting phrase suggests that there will be some in the resurrection who do not believe in Him, and will, in fact, die again.
In both verses pisteuWn {believing} is an active voice, present tense verb. This is why RYLT and other literal translations have "and is believing in me."
Jesus isn't specifically addressing those who won't share in the life of the {future} resurrection in these verses, nor of the judgment of unbelievers. He's speaking of the currently believing. From Jesus' teachings elsewhere, we could surmise that those who do not believe won't share in resurrected life {being "limited" and/or "restricted" from it}.
An apparent point here, imo, is that death doesn't "stop" faith: Believers who have passed on retain it {without going into anything about an intermediate state right now}. Also, whether or not resurrected unbelievers can "gain faith" is beyond the scope of this thread {I don't wish to "contest" any of that here either, as we covered it on the old forum. At any rate, in John 11:25-26, Jesus only speaks about current believers and the future resurrection life they will possess}.
__________
The phrase "believes in me" has more to do with just {what we might call} "having saving faith in God."
Josephus used the phrase, "Repent, and believe in me" when speaking to a Jewish rebel. What he meant was that this rebel should "change your mind and fully trust in me" by surrendering to the Romans.
N.T. Wright commented on this; that he was totally surprised to see Josephus say the same thing Jesus did! Wright suggests that when Jesus said it to his Jewish contemporaries, they would have understood it as the total trust and commitment to Messiah when he would come. In other words, for Christ, "Repent, and believe in me" wasn't as much about How To Go To Heaven (After You Die) as it was: My Messianic Kingdom Has Arrived: Change your Minds And Trust Me Fully....{now and forever}!
Yes, my interpretation of John 11:25-27 is compatible with my other beliefs.You also wrote:However, I suppose that would be entirely consistent with the position of annihilist-amillenialism that the unbelievers will be raised along with the believers at Jesus coming, and that the "second death" which they will experience will be annihilation, and thus they will die again.
Btw, I don't have everything "ironed out" on the second death and other eschatology themes, though I work-with my amillennial-conditional immortality views.
I plan on starting new Eschatology threads to discuss these.
Sorry about the delayed reply, Thanks, Don,
