Thanks for you answer, and the comment on Luke 2:1. I did reference this verse earlier in our discussion and my friend has not yet made any objections to the limited meaning of "the world". However, he did object to reading v30 as "all the tribes of the land will mourn" ... but thats another issue, and I don't want to get this thread going to far off topic.
Our presuppositions have a lot to do with what our view of the "forest" is. I can see how a futurist presupposition could be reinforced by Matthew 24:14. But, of course, this requires utilizing either of the following premises: 1) The entire planet was meant by "the world", or 2) The geographic extent of the Roman empire was not evangelized by 70 AD.Sometimes, getting real technical about the tenses in the Greek language causes us to miss the forest for the trees
Paidion
Thanks for the explanation. Given your description of tenses I understand the answer to be that Jesus words in Matthew 24:14 are compatible with an initiated and ongoing action that is not yet complete. If so, it is not even necessary to rely on the view that "the world" is limited in extent to the Roman empire, because the process of the gospel spreading throughout the world was already underway.
Peter