Can the Spirit "Fail"?

__id_2618
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by __id_2618 » Fri May 09, 2008 9:40 pm

What Calvinist teaches that sanctifying grace fails to accomplish its purpose? On the contrary, we believe that since the whole of salvation is the work of God, that He will not fail:

For I am confident of this very thing, that He who began a good work in you will perfect it until the day of Christ Jesus. (Phil 1:6, NASB
Bshow,

The reality is that many Christians live defeated lives to the flesh, sin, and demonic influences. Why? Is God's grace not effectual in this regard?

1 Cor 10:13
No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it.

If God "sits back" and withholds grace necessary for many of His children to resist temptation, then He is not faithful, He does let many be tempted beyond their ability, and has not provided the way of escape that they may be able to endure it. The very faithfulness of God hangs upon this. If Calvinism is true, God is not faithful. So, why is sanctifying, temptation resisting grace not effectual?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

__id_2674
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by __id_2674 » Sat May 10, 2008 12:45 am

Perhaps the calvinist finds it that God in his own purpose has the elect to fail in many parts of their lives to keep them humble.

The question does not seem problematic to me for the reformed. They simply see that EVERYTHING is under God's sov. even when the elect don't obey within their salvation.

Not only that but it seems EVEN in disobedience the elect have NO STAINS because their righteoussness is NOT OF THEIR ACTIONS but of Christ's.

Auggy
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_bshow
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by _bshow » Sat May 10, 2008 6:55 am

Troy C wrote:
What Calvinist teaches that sanctifying grace fails to accomplish its purpose? On the contrary, we believe that since the whole of salvation is the work of God, that He will not fail:

For I am confident of this very thing, that He who began a good work in you will perfect it until the day of Christ Jesus. (Phil 1:6, NASB
Bshow,

The reality is that many Christians live defeated lives to the flesh, sin, and demonic influences. Why? Is God's grace not effectual in this regard?

1 Cor 10:13
No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it.

If God "sits back" and withholds grace necessary for many of His children to resist temptation, then He is not faithful, He does let many be tempted beyond their ability, and has not provided the way of escape that they may be able to endure it. The very faithfulness of God hangs upon this. If Calvinism is true, God is not faithful. So, why is sanctifying, temptation resisting grace not effectual?
Hi Troy,

I'm sorry, but I have no idea what you're getting at.

First, I do not accept your claim that "The reality is that many Christians live defeated lives to the flesh, sin, and demonic influences." This is not "reality" at all.

Second, where have I or any Calvinist taught that God "sits back and withholds grace necessary for many of His children to resist temptation?" This is not Calvinist teaching.

Is it your claim that because many Christians live (according to you) "defeated lives", that God has allowed them to be tempted beyond what they are able to resist? If so (and I don't accept it), then what is your explanation? Is God unfaithful? I'm not seeing how this line of argument bears on my position.

Sanctifying grace is effectual. All who are called are justified and all who are justified are glorified, Rom 8:30.

Cheers,
Bob
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_darin-houston
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Houston, TX

Post by _darin-houston » Sat May 10, 2008 8:28 am

bshow wrote:First, I do not accept your claim that "The reality is that many Christians live defeated lives to the flesh, sin, and demonic influences." This is not "reality" at all.
So, how do you take Romans 7:14-25 ? I think most regenerated people can relate to Paul's own struggle.

The Conflict of Two Natures

14 For we know that the Law is spiritual, but I am of flesh, sold into bondage to sin. 15 For what I am doing, I do not understand; for I am not practicing what I would like to do, but I am doing the very thing I hate. 16 But if I do the very thing I do not want to do, I agree with the Law, confessing that the Law is good. 17 So now, no longer am I the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me. 18 For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh; for the willing is present in me, but the doing of the good is not. 19 For the good that I want, I do not do, but I practice the very evil that I do not want. 20 But if I am doing the very thing I do not want, I am no longer the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me.
21 I find then the principle that evil is present in me, the one who wants to do good. 22 For I joyfully concur with the law of God in the inner man, 23 but I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin which is in my members. 24 Wretched man that I am! Who will set me free from the body of this death? 25 Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, on the one hand I myself with my mind am serving the law of God, but on the other, with my flesh the law of sin.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_bshow
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by _bshow » Sat May 10, 2008 9:21 am

darin-houston wrote:
bshow wrote:First, I do not accept your claim that "The reality is that many Christians live defeated lives to the flesh, sin, and demonic influences." This is not "reality" at all.
So, how do you take Romans 7:14-25 ? I think most regenerated people can relate to Paul's own struggle.
I take them as written. But not as evidence of an ultimate "defeat" or "failure", which seems to be the force of Troy's argument. Rom 7 leads to Rom 8, where he teaches the impossiblity of defeat. So if he's talking about ultimate defeat, I reject the premise.

I'm still not sure what Troy is asking. Is he asking me for a Calvinist explanation of the failure of a true Christian to be finally saved? Since Calvinists don't hold to that as a possibility, I don't understand the question.

Cheers,
Bob
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_darin-houston
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Houston, TX

Post by _darin-houston » Sat May 10, 2008 1:12 pm

I take them as written. But not as evidence of an ultimate "defeat" or "failure", which seems to be the force of Troy's argument. Rom 7 leads to Rom 8, where he teaches the impossiblity of defeat. So if he's talking about ultimate defeat, I reject the premise.

I'm still not sure what Troy is asking. Is he asking me for a Calvinist explanation of the failure of a true Christian to be finally saved? Since Calvinists don't hold to that as a possibility, I don't understand the question.
I'll let Troy speak for himself, but I get the impression that he was not speaking of the ultimate "salvific" failure, but instead the ultimate inevitability of failure in degree of the regenerate to walk in the Spirit. This is what I see Paul confessing to.

Unless you're the first Calvinist I've ever heard of who holds to "entire sanctification," then we must agree that sanctifying grace definitely fails in part. So, Troy's question is "granting this, then what do you make of it?"
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_bshow
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by _bshow » Sat May 10, 2008 3:46 pm

darin-houston wrote:Unless you're the first Calvinist I've ever heard of who holds to "entire sanctification," then we must agree that sanctifying grace definitely fails in part. So, Troy's question is "granting this, then what do you make of it?"
No we don't agree, and I don't make anything of it. I don't see it as a failure of sanctifying grace, even in part.

Cheers,
Bob
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

__id_2618
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by __id_2618 » Sat May 10, 2008 6:16 pm

I am not talking about ultimate or final salvation. Perserverance of the saints is not in my frame of reference for my question. Nor am I talking about false converts. Am I clear on this? I am not talking about final glorification in the physical kingdom of God. What I am talking about is us going through the process of being saved and sanctified, which takes place once we have been saved. Why do many geniune believers struggle with sin, slowly grow in the faith and bear very little fruit?


Isaiah 1:2-4
"Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth: for the LORD hath spoken, I have nourished and brought up children, and they have rebelled against me. The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master's crib: but Israel doth not know, my people doth not consider. Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the LORD, they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone away backward."

In this text God calls these people His children, and even says that He personally raised them. Should we suppose God did not give the necessary grace that would enable them to remain with Him in obedience and thus keep them from forsaking Him? Most Christians would view God as a good Father, and would think that He would give His children all the necessary things to persevere in faith, sanctification and love. In fact, most Christians really do believe their Father is faithful, and that he will not let them be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that they may be able to endure it. This is what the Scripture says, and God's Faithfulness hangs upon it.

Isaiah 5:4
"What could have been done more to my vineyard (Israel), that I have not done in it? wherefore, when I looked that it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wild grapes?"

Was God being sincere when He lamented that He did all He could do to produce good fruit in Israel? If He was sincere, why was His provision of grace intentionally not effectual? This is exactly what I am talking about. Calvinism says God's grace for the relatively few unbelievers chosen for eternal life is effectual to bring them to faith. Why then is His grace for those who have been brought to faith not effectual to produce fruit, sanctification and maturity? It would seem to follow that God would continue to work in an effectual way to produce fruit, sanctification/holiness and maturity if He has indeed worked in an effectual way to bring sinners to faith. But even this is questioned by those who aren't trained to believe in Calvinism.


Jeremiah 13:15-17,
“Hear and pay attention, do not be arrogant, for the LORD has spoken. Give glory to the LORD your God before he brings the darkness…But if you do not listen, I will weep in secret because of your pride; my eyes will weep bitterly, overflowing with tears, because the LORD’s flock will be taken captive.”

With regards to this passage, Walls and Dongell make the following observation,

“Knowing that Judah did not turn and listen, the Calvinist concludes that God had already chosen to withhold his transforming grace from them, though he could easily have granted it. So while the text seems to identify Judah’s pride as the root cause of punishment, the Calvinist instead concludes that Judah’s ability to repent depends on God’s eternally fixed plan. Again, although the text seems to identify salvation as God’s deepest desire, the Calvinist must conclude that at a deeper level God never intended to bestow transforming grace on Jeremiah’s hearers. In other words, the true intentions of God cannot be discerned from his words.” [Why I Am Not A Calvinist, pg. 57- emphasis in original]
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_darin-houston
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Houston, TX

Post by _darin-houston » Sat May 10, 2008 7:08 pm

No we don't agree, and I don't make anything of it. I don't see it as a failure of sanctifying grace, even in part.
Then, I suspect we have a definitional problem. I suspect you're focusing on "failure." Is that the word you have a problem with? I don't mean it in any way to imply God's "inability," but the fact that he chooses to let us fail in our sanctification. It is "us" who fail (free choice again). He gives us the out, but we choose not to take it... etc. Does that help?
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

_bshow
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm

Post by _bshow » Mon May 12, 2008 7:24 am

Troy C wrote:What I am talking about is us going through the process of being saved and sanctified, which takes place once we have been saved. Why do many geniune believers struggle with sin, slowly grow in the faith and bear very little fruit?
Hi Troy,

Well we both have to answer that question, right?

Your complaint seems to be that since we teach that the initial grace of regeneration is effective and always perfectly accomplishes its purpose, why shouldn't the subsequent grace of sanctification always perfectly accomplish its purpose? If God saves us, why aren't we immediately perfectly sanctified and obedient?

My answer is simple: I see the scripture teaching both ideas, I don't find any logical inconsistency in the two, and so I appropriate both ideas. The scriptures clearly teach that sanctification is a process, involving a struggle within our members, between the old nature and the new nature. We can have setbacks and have to struggle to overcome them. But since sanctification is part of the whole process of salvation, which is a work of God, then we have confidence that He will complete it and conform us to His image.

Cheers,
Bob
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

Post Reply

Return to “Calvinism, Arminianism & Open Theism”