Is John 12:41 a good proof text for the Trinity?
- 21centpilgrim
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:17 pm
Is John 12:41 a good proof text for the Trinity?
Regarding John 12:41- Isaiah said these things because he saw his glory and spoke of him.
This is immediately following two quotes from Isa.6:10 and Isa. 53:1, and I have heard people use this to support the Trinity.
Is it necessary to conclude that John is affirming Jesus is Jehovah?
Is it not clear enough to affirm that John is claiming that when Isaiah saw the exalted King and the suffering servant, that he saw Jesus' glory?
This is immediately following two quotes from Isa.6:10 and Isa. 53:1, and I have heard people use this to support the Trinity.
Is it necessary to conclude that John is affirming Jesus is Jehovah?
Is it not clear enough to affirm that John is claiming that when Isaiah saw the exalted King and the suffering servant, that he saw Jesus' glory?
Then those who feared the LORD spoke with each other, and the LORD listened to what they said. In his presence, a scroll of remembrance was written to record the names of those who feared him and loved to think about him.
Re: Is John 12:41 a good proof text for the Trinity?
I have no idea how anyone gets the Trinity out of this passage.
As to your question about Jesus being Jehovah (or "Yahweh" which I think is a better transliteration of the Hebrew Tetragrammaton), I don't see the passage as even hinting at that.
A much better passage that indicates that there are Two who share the name "Yahweh" is Genesis 19:24. Justin Martyr referred to this in his dialogue with Trypho:
One of three "men" who came to Abraham, was addressed as "Yahweh" by Abraham. The other two went to Sodom, but Yahweh remained behind. Later, Yahweh departed also.
Then Yahweh rained on Sodom and Gomorrah sulfur and fire from Yahweh out of heaven.(Gen 19:24)
This seems to suggest that the Yahweh who spoke to Abraham was the Son, and that the Yahweh in heaven was the Father.
Thus Genesis 19:24 may mean that the Yahweh in heaven used the Yahweh on earth as his agent to bring down the fire on Sodom and Gomorrah.
But this doesn't support the Trinity concept. Rather it indicates that two divine Individuals share the name "Yahweh."
As to your question about Jesus being Jehovah (or "Yahweh" which I think is a better transliteration of the Hebrew Tetragrammaton), I don't see the passage as even hinting at that.
A much better passage that indicates that there are Two who share the name "Yahweh" is Genesis 19:24. Justin Martyr referred to this in his dialogue with Trypho:
One of three "men" who came to Abraham, was addressed as "Yahweh" by Abraham. The other two went to Sodom, but Yahweh remained behind. Later, Yahweh departed also.
Then Yahweh rained on Sodom and Gomorrah sulfur and fire from Yahweh out of heaven.(Gen 19:24)
This seems to suggest that the Yahweh who spoke to Abraham was the Son, and that the Yahweh in heaven was the Father.
Thus Genesis 19:24 may mean that the Yahweh in heaven used the Yahweh on earth as his agent to bring down the fire on Sodom and Gomorrah.
But this doesn't support the Trinity concept. Rather it indicates that two divine Individuals share the name "Yahweh."
Paidion
Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.
Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.
Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.
Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.
- 21centpilgrim
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:17 pm
Re: Is John 12:41 a good proof text for the Trinity?
I heard James White in a debate use this text as a proof for the Trinity, which is why I asked in the first place. I don't see it but maybe others could shed light as they see/read it?
Then those who feared the LORD spoke with each other, and the LORD listened to what they said. In his presence, a scroll of remembrance was written to record the names of those who feared him and loved to think about him.
Re: Is John 12:41 a good proof text for the Trinity?
This verse is about Jesus' deity. John's gospel has the most full-blown Christology of any of the gospels. It is making the point that Jesus was God much stronger than the others. (Mark doesn't at all, for example.)
But the gospels know nothing of the trinity. It is a theological attempt to synthesize different statements in the gospels and letters that are hard to piece together, especially given the monotheism of Judaism.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But the gospels know nothing of the trinity. It is a theological attempt to synthesize different statements in the gospels and letters that are hard to piece together, especially given the monotheism of Judaism.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.
JeffreyLong.net
Jesusna.me
@30thirteen
JeffreyLong.net
Jesusna.me
@30thirteen
Re: Is John 12:41 a good proof text for the Trinity?
This is proof for deity not the Trinity.
- 21centpilgrim
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:17 pm
Re: Is John 12:41 a good proof text for the Trinity?
Well, how is it a proof of deity?
Then those who feared the LORD spoke with each other, and the LORD listened to what they said. In his presence, a scroll of remembrance was written to record the names of those who feared him and loved to think about him.
Re: Is John 12:41 a good proof text for the Trinity?
Isaiah saw YHWH high and lifted up. And he saw Jesus' glory. It's pretty clear that is exactly what John wrote.21centpilgrim wrote:Well, how is it a proof of deity?
- 21centpilgrim
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:17 pm
Re: Is John 12:41 a good proof text for the Trinity?
Isaiah saw Jesus' glory, not Jesus. That is what John says.
They are not the same.
They are not the same.
Then those who feared the LORD spoke with each other, and the LORD listened to what they said. In his presence, a scroll of remembrance was written to record the names of those who feared him and loved to think about him.
Re: Is John 12:41 a good proof text for the Trinity?
ok great argument21centpilgrim wrote:Isaiah saw Jesus' glory, not Jesus. That is what John says.
They are not the same.
- 21centpilgrim
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:17 pm
Re: Is John 12:41 a good proof text for the Trinity?
Jesus said that he shared glory with the Father in John 17.
So in Isaiah seeing the glory of the LORD in Isaiah 6 he was also seeing the glory of Jesus, that does not thereby mean that they are one in the same.
Does that help?
So in Isaiah seeing the glory of the LORD in Isaiah 6 he was also seeing the glory of Jesus, that does not thereby mean that they are one in the same.
Does that help?
Then those who feared the LORD spoke with each other, and the LORD listened to what they said. In his presence, a scroll of remembrance was written to record the names of those who feared him and loved to think about him.