There is (and has been) a great problem with the idea that the Holy Spirit speaks to people today as He did to the Apostles. Around 1830 Sidney Rigdon began to speculate that God's revelation might not be complete. Rigdon was a prominent preacher of the time and was rebuked by Alexander Campbell for this idea. Then Rigdon met Joseph Smith, who claimed new revelation, and joined him in forming the Latter Day Saints. So we need to carefully consider how the Holy Spirit speaks to us today. As a local Baptist lady remarked, God speaks to her through the scriptures. I tend to agree with her. When He speaks to me it is more like being poked with a sharp stick than an audible sound.Sam wrote:
I consider the New Testament record to be the final revelation from God, given through the Apostles and Prophets by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
And TK responded:
I guess I don't quite get what you mean here. Are you saying that the HS never "speaks" to Christians any more? or gives them "words of knowledge" and the like? if that is what you are saying, then we are millions of miles apart in our theology, but that is okay with me.
The problem with applying the promise that "the Spirit will guide you into all truth" is that there is nothing in the text to distinguish any difference in the degree or way this might apply to anyone, such as those who Jesus spoke directly to, Joseph Smith, Ellen White, or to us.
Regarding why Jesus had to go away for the Spirit to come, the possible explanation might be that the Spirit is in a form that can be everywhere while Jesus, in His resurrected body, has a particular location.
This translation is problematic. The Greek word lambano, translated "receive", is the word for taking something. Jesus just commissioned them to go in V. 21 and He might be simply saying to them to take the Spirit when you go.Rich wrote:
The apostles seemed to receive the Holy Spirit when Jesus breathed on them (John 20:22).