Todd wrote: smcllr3 wrote:If the passage can read either way then wouldn't you lean on stronger scriptures than these?
It is my opinion that the natural reading of these particular scriptures is the way I presented them; although, many people have reasoned a way to understand them differently.
Sure. However, if your natural understanding were incorrect and theirs was correct, it would seem that you were reasoning a way to understand them in an arbitrary way. So what I am saying is if you
are incorrect, it is not established by these scriptures. So why not present the scriptures that present a compelling argument for the view.
But I'm only suggesting because I haven't found any. Which you already know that because I said as much, anyway.
Todd wrote: smcllr3 wrote:And here is a question I haven't seen anyone ask yet; when Jesus sits on the throne in Matthew 25 to deal out rewards and punishment, along with little simple statements like the one found in 1 Peter 1:17, Rom 2:6, etc, it seems that the opportunity to gain immortality is strictly limited to this mortal life.
Christ took his seat at God's right hand as soon as He ascended to heaven. Since then He has been sitting in judgment and will continue in this mode until "his enemies be made his footstool." Those who are overcome in sin reap what they sow: guilt, shame, contempt, anxiety, fear, and corruption. This is God's divine punishment as He rewards them according to their works. All of God's punishments are proportional and limited. Conversely, those who follow Christ in faith are rewarded with the fruits of the Spirit: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, gentleness, and self-control.
That doesn't seem to be the natural reading of Matthew 25. Well I agree with the first part, mostly. It is my understanding, correct me if I am wrong,
-the sheep and the goats are at the end of their life because they are looking back on their life recalling the collection of their deeds.
-And there are not multiple punishments and rewards for individual deeds but one singular reward or punishment, that is apparently eternal, based on the collection of their deeds.
-And it would be hard to say that the fruit of the spirit is the act of our inheriting the kingdom when we are
told to walk in the spirit here on earth. They do not seem to be the rewards themselves because the fruit of the spirit is in juxtaposition to the deeds of the flesh in Galatians 5.
Then the
collection of these fruits are judged whereby we inherit the kingdom or face an indefinite fiery end. So the passage differentiates between the fruit and the inheritance. That seems to be the teaching of the parable in Matthew 25.
My point was this, that nowhere in the bible do you see anything done after death being considered at the judgment. It is always things done on earth.
Todd wrote:Acts 3:20-21
20 and that He may send Jesus Christ, who was preached to you before, 21 whom heaven must receive until the times of restoration of all things, which God has spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began.
Here's the main point. There is coming a time when Christ will restore all things. He has reconciled the whole world unto Himself. Every knee shall bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus is Lord, to the glory of the Father.
There is coming a time when Christ will restore all things...
...spoken of by God through the mouth of prophets.
When you add that last part you add another translation option. And the fact that not one of the prophets ever said that every created thing in the entire kosmos would be restored, it kinda leaves a void that needs the rest of the sentence to make since. "...restore all things spoken of by God through the mouth of the prophets." Now that is limited to something less than "all things" as you rendered it. But if you go to biblegateway dot com and click on keyword search and select NASB as the version then type in the partial word "restor" click search and then thumb through to the prophets, you will notice that "all things spoken of by the prophets" that involve any word that begins with the six letters "r-e-s-t-o-r" are limited to the remnant of Israel and its fortunes. So I think my own understanding has at least one leg to stand on. Maybe.
Todd wrote:He has reconciled the whole world unto Himself...
Sure, but after he says that he says, "Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were making an appeal through us; we beg you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God."
It seems to me that what God did through Christ in reconciling the world to himself was that he didn't count their trespasses against them, but it requires our cooperation as well. So if we don't want to be reconciled to God, then what happens? We are anyway? It doesn't seem like that is the implication but that is only my opinion. I'm not sure this is in favor of the Universalist view though.
Todd wrote: Every knee shall bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus is Lord, to the glory of the Father.
Yes but... this is like saying, "even the demons believe and shutter" but they are not saved. I don't see the part where it says all will be saved in Phil 2 either. Now that is also my opinion.
Anyway, so yeah. That is just another way of looking at those verses and they, to me at least, seem more correct. I'm no scholar though and you might find a hole in my argument as well. However, when two views can be true, it is better to look for stronger verses.
"For we will surely die and are like water spilled on the ground which cannot be gathered up again Yet God does not take away life, but plans ways so that the banished one will not be cast out from him." II Samuel 14:14