Questions for proponents of CI

Post Reply
User avatar
Todd
Posts: 257
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:09 pm

Questions for proponents of CI

Post by Todd » Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:46 am

The New Testament uses the word "death" in at least two common ways.
1. physical death (i.e., the death of the physical body)
2. spiritual death (describing someone who is living yet overcome in sin)

The proponents of Conditional Immortality see a third use.
3. annihilation (non-existence of spirit, soul and body)

Rom 6:23
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

This verse seems to be used as a proof-text for Conditional Immortality (CI). It seems that the word "death" is taken to mean "annihilation". Have I understood this properly? If so, how do you draw that conclusion?

The following verse seems to relate sin with physical death. Is there any relation between these verses?

Rom 8:10
And if Christ is in you, the body is dead because of sin, but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.

Todd

steve7150
Posts: 2597
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:44 am

Re: Questions for proponents of CI

Post by steve7150 » Sat May 02, 2009 11:42 am

The proponents of Conditional Immortality see a third use.
3. annihilation (non-existence of spirit, soul and body)

Rom 6:23
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.





It's not clear to me that Paul is referring to physical death verses spiritual death for in the previous chapter he says,
"Death ruled from the time of Adam to the time of Moses" Rom 5.14.
Clearly physical death did'nt end with Moses but spiritual death could have because the law gave an opportunity to have some type of relationship with God.

User avatar
mattrose
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:28 am
Contact:

Re: Questions for proponents of CI

Post by mattrose » Sat May 02, 2009 6:34 pm

A dichotomist (or trichotomist) presupposition is built into your question rendering it difficult to answer. You're assuming that physical death is only the partial death of a person, whereas, if we are holistically unified beings, death is death.

I tend toward a view of being that is connected to both monism and the dichotomist position. I believe we are essentially holistic, but that believers are kept alive in God's memory, so to speak, until resurrection. But this 'kept alive' is something real and is a conscious existence.

User avatar
Suzana
Posts: 503
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 3:09 am
Location: Australia

Re: Questions for proponents of CI

Post by Suzana » Sat May 02, 2009 7:05 pm

mattrose wrote:I believe we are essentially holistic, but that believers are kept alive in God's memory, so to speak, until resurrection. But this 'kept alive' is something real and is a conscious existence.
I'm finding it difficult to get my head around a real conscious existence in God's memory. :?:
Maybe it's the way it's worded, but to me it sounds a bit sci-fi?
Suzana
_________________________
If a man cannot be a Christian in the place he is, he cannot be a Christian anywhere. - Henry Ward Beecher

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: Questions for proponents of CI

Post by Paidion » Sat May 02, 2009 9:45 pm

I, too, Suzana. I can fully accept that God remembers every individual, and on that basis He can bring that same person back to life at the resurrection. But I cannot comprehend the idea that God's memory constitutes a "real conscious existence" for each of those individuals.
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

User avatar
Todd
Posts: 257
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:09 pm

Re: Questions for proponents of CI

Post by Todd » Sun May 03, 2009 7:05 am

mattrose wrote:I tend toward a view of being that is connected to both monism and the dichotomist position. I believe we are essentially holistic, but that believers are kept alive in God's memory, so to speak, until resurrection. But this 'kept alive' is something real and is a conscious existence.
Matt,

Am I correct to assume from this answer that you think only believers will be resurrected? If so, why did Paul say that both the just and unjust will be resurrected?

Todd

steve7150
Posts: 2597
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:44 am

Re: Questions for proponents of CI

Post by steve7150 » Sat May 09, 2009 8:25 pm

I, too, Suzana. I can fully accept that God remembers every individual, and on that basis He can bring that same person back to life at the resurrection. But I cannot comprehend the idea that God's memory constitutes a "real conscious existence" for each of those individuals.




Extending that logic then perhaps we were alive before we were born since God may know us before we are born.

But i am a trichotomist because we are made in the image of God and He is Spirit therefore i think we do have a Spirit Man that the Holy Spirit speaks to as Paul said.
We have talked about this topic many times but Paul said to die is gain and Jesus said believers would never die. There is only one state of being that reconciles with these statements.

User avatar
mattrose
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:28 am
Contact:

Re: Questions for proponents of CI

Post by mattrose » Sat May 09, 2009 11:47 pm

Matt,

Am I correct to assume from this answer that you think only believers will be resurrected? If so, why did Paul say that both the just and unjust will be resurrected?

Todd
Hey Todd :)

No, I believe in a general resurrection of the dead. I was referring to the fact that believers experience something beforehand.

As for my statements about believers existing in God's memory, I agree it sounds sci-fi'ish. It's just a theory that tries to blend monism with the believer's post-death consciousness.

Post Reply

Return to “Views of Hell”