Calvin's commentary on Eph 2:1

User avatar
robbyyoung
Posts: 811
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:23 am

Re: Calvin's commentary on Eph 2:1

Post by robbyyoung » Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:37 pm

Sean wrote:I believe we were chosen "in him". Meaning, we are chosen when we come to faith in Christ, when we attach ourselves by faith to Christ. It's like saying those animals were chosen "in the ark". Meaning, the ark was the only escape from the flood and all who were "in the ark" were chosen in that sense. They were saved. Jesus is the elect one. We are also chosen "in him", which is different from saying 'we were chosen to be in him'.
Hello Sean,

You are seeking to comprehend God's sovereignty, but, I think you are redefining what being "chosen in Him" means biblically. Note the following biblical definition:

Romans 8:29 For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.

Romans 8:30 And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified

John 17:6 I have manifested Your name to the men whom You gave Me out of the world; they were Yours and You gave them to Me, and they have kept Your word. (Sounds like chosen to be in him to me)

John 17:12 While I was with them, I was keeping them in Your name which You have given Me; and I guarded them and not one of them perished but the son of perdition, so that the Scripture would be fulfilled.

"Foreknew"
1. to have knowledge before hand
2. of those whom God elected to salvation to predestinate

"Predestinate"
1. to predetermine, decide beforehand
2. in the NT of God decreeing from eternity
3. to foreordain, appoint beforehand

Again, I'm not trying to find clever ways to say "God really means" and totally redefine plain contextual language. The question I have is, does He (God) quicken every soul to respond to the call? If so, we rejoice, but it by no means makes void God's prerogative, and just in case we question that right, He says:

You will say to me then, "Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?" On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God?

So I just accept and yield to His majesty. God Bless!

steve7150
Posts: 2597
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:44 am

Re: Calvin's commentary on Eph 2:1

Post by steve7150 » Sat Nov 02, 2013 9:27 am

John 17:6 I have manifested Your name to the men whom You gave Me out of the world; they were Yours and You gave them to Me, and they have kept Your word. (Sounds like chosen to be in him to me)

John 17:12 While I was with them, I was keeping them in Your name which You have given Me; and I guarded them and not one of them perished but the son of perdition, so that the Scripture would be fulfilled.








Robby,
It's clear Jesus chose the 12 since he actually said to them "I have chosen you" but does that mean God chooses every single believer. When you look at the entirety of scripture with all the exhortations to believe and all the warnings not to fall away , does that square with God electing individual people to salvation?
God's will is indeed irresistible so then why all the exhortations and warnings?

User avatar
robbyyoung
Posts: 811
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:23 am

Re: Calvin's commentary on Eph 2:1

Post by robbyyoung » Sat Nov 02, 2013 9:47 am

steve7150 wrote:Robby,
It's clear Jesus chose the 12 since he actually said to them "I have chosen you" but does that mean God chooses every single believer. When you look at the entirety of scripture with all the exhortations to believe and all the warnings not to fall away , does that square with God electing individual people to salvation?
God's will is indeed irresistible so then why all the exhortations and warnings?
Hi Steve,

God bless, and good to hear from. Yes, this is my point, both realities seems to be true. My emphasis was to show God does enact His sovereign will to elect, predestinate, and choose; I think we are in error when we deny this. With that said, does this refer to all God's children? Probably not.

But one thing is for sure, God must resurrect every human being from spiritual death, but when and if He does this - isn't He rejecting man's freewill to remain spiritually dead? Or is the argument, since man is spiritually dead He currently has no freewill and God is being merciful by making them alive to choose once and for all to serve Him?

Interesting isn't it? God bless my friend.

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 407
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 4:48 am
Location: Smithton, IL USA

Re: Calvin's commentary on Eph 2:1

Post by Sean » Mon Nov 04, 2013 2:40 am

robbyyoung wrote:
Hello Sean,

You are seeking to comprehend God's sovereignty, but, I think you are redefining what being "chosen in Him" means biblically. Note the following biblical definition:

Romans 8:29 For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.

Romans 8:30 And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified
I don't see how Romans 8's "golden chain" contradicts what I said. It seems to fit well with what I have stated.
First, it (Rom 8:29-30) states that those whom he foreknew he predestined. I understand this to mean God predestined "those". The basis was His foreknowledge, as in knowledge of the future.
Second, it states that what is predestined for "those" is that they be conformed to the image of His Son.
Third, it states that "those" are predestined, called, justified & glorified!

Are we glorified? Not yet. We are awaiting that day (2 Thes 2:14). But "in Christ" we are, because He is glorified. Those who are "in Him" share in all things that belong to Christ. In this sense we can be said to be all those things listed in Romans 8:30, just as it can be said of us that we are seated in heavenly places "in Christ" (Eph 2:6). We are not seated in heavenly places, but Christ is. So if we are "in Christ" we are seated in heavenly places and we are also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son (glorified).

"Those" whom He foreknew are the group of believers called the church. They are the ones God foreknew and predestined to be like Jesus. But the group called the church can have people come into it by faith and can also be cut off by unbelief as Paul states in Romans 11 with his olive tree illustration.

It does not say we were predestined to be in Christ! We are chosen if we are in Him and we are lost if we are not in Him. Only "in Him" do we find eternal life (1 John 5:11-12).
robbyyoung wrote: John 17:6 I have manifested Your name to the men whom You gave Me out of the world; they were Yours and You gave them to Me, and they have kept Your word. (Sounds like chosen to be in him to me)

John 17:12 While I was with them, I was keeping them in Your name which You have given Me; and I guarded them and not one of them perished but the son of perdition, so that the Scripture would be fulfilled.
These passages don't seem to help your case. John 17:6 says "they were Yours and You gave them to Me". This means that, if we read in context, these people were not the devils people but rather those who belong to the Father. These were already the faithful remnant within Israel who were awaiting the Messiah. God took those people, who were already faithful, and gave them to Jesus. In other words, the Messiah has arrived and God has handed this remnant to the Messiah during this transition period. But the gospel has since that time gone out to all nations, to people held captive by the devil. Freeing these people is not a matter of freeing people from the Father and giving them to Jesus (as John 17:6 states). These are two different things.

Additionally, John 17:12 refutes the notion that John chapters 6 & 10 prove unconditional election or perseverance of the saints. Since Judas fell away, even though John 6:44 states: “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day." But Judas came and was in fact chosen to be an apostle with the other 11 yet fell away. An exception to the rule means John 6:44 & John 10:28 aren't unconditional.
robbyyoung wrote: Again, I'm not trying to find clever ways to say "God really means" and totally redefine plain contextual language. The question I have is, does He (God) quicken every soul to respond to the call? If so, we rejoice, but it by no means makes void God's prerogative, and just in case we question that right, He says:

You will say to me then, "Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?" On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God?

So I just accept and yield to His majesty. God Bless!
I don't see any evidence in scripture where God regenerates before someone responds to the gospel call. You are born again when you believe, not before.

As far as Romans 9 that you quote. I understand this differently. The statement "who are you, O man, who answers back to God?" is an example of Paul pointing out the error of the man's statement: "Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?". Paul is essentially saying to that man: 'you are resisting His will by "answering back" to God. Paul is not agreeing with the man in saying that no one resists God's will, Paul is saying God does find fault because people do resist his will, in this case back-talking God is resisting Him.
He will not fail nor be discouraged till He has established justice in the earth. (Isaiah 42:4)

rcassell
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:58 pm

Re: Calvin's commentary on Eph 2:1

Post by rcassell » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:10 pm

Hi Sean:

In one sense, you might be right that Calvin wouldn't agree with modern day Calvinists. The statements that I am about to make come from someone who professed to be a Calvinist for over 20 years, and who has read considerably from Calvin's writings. Most modern Calvinists are very squeamish when it comes to Calvinistic doctrines. Unlike their father (Calvin), they want to be accepted and want to appear loving. They have concocted the story that John Calvin really wasn't a Calvinist in some areas, particularly in the area of limited atonement. What Calvin truly taught was that anyone who did not believe in double predestination was a reprobate, "being hardened by God." If you will take a look at his sermons on Ephesians, you will get a much more indepth, and undiluted, picture of his theology. Also, in his sermons on 1 & 2 Timothy, particularly regarding 1 Timothy 2:4, "who would have all men to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth," he casts great dispersions on anyone believing that text means what it says, that God desires the salvation of all men. He clearly lays out in that sermon that anyone believing that God desires all men to be saved, are reprobates and unregenerate.

Ron

Post Reply

Return to “Calvinism, Arminianism & Open Theism”