Page 1 of 1

Which one is best?

Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 1:22 am
by Perry
I'm at the point of attempting to figure out which “voice” to use for converting Steve's Authority of Scripture Lectures into text. In the lecture Steve sometimes uses a “we” voice and sometimes uses a “you” voice. I think there are advantages and disadvantages to all of these styles, but, whichever I eventually settle on, I think it would be best to use a consistent voice throughout.

I picked a non-theological topic in hopes of avoiding criticism of content. I'm just looking for style advice here. :)

Which do you guys like better?


Original transcript
The only reason to learn words that you don’t know is because it promotes an economy of effort in communication. If you know a concept and you can express it using a paragraph of words, well that’s fine. But if you know one word that conveys that whole paragraph of information, and your listener knows that word too, you can simply use that word and you don’t have to use the whole paragraph every time you want to talk about it. That’s the value of vocabulary. You can find, often, a word that, in itself, its definition is a paragraph long. But if everyone knows the word, you don’t have to read the whole definition of it every time you want to communicate the thought.


Colloquial “you”
A good vocabulary promotes an economy of effort in communication. That's the reason for learning new words. If you understand a concept and you can express it using a paragraph of words, that’s okay, but if you can discover a single word that conveys the same idea, and if your audience knows that word too, you can just use that word. You don’t have to use the whole paragraph every time. Often you can find just such a word. That’s the value of vocabulary. If everyone knows the word, you can use it to communicate better.

Colloquial “we”
A good vocabulary promotes an economy of effort in communication. That's the reason for learning new words. If we understand a concept and can express it using a paragraph of words, that’s okay, but if we can discover a single word that conveys the same idea, and if our audience knows that word too, we can just use that word. We don’t have to use the whole paragraph every time. Often we can find just such a word. That’s the value of vocabulary. If everyone knows the word, we can use it to better communicate.


More Formal
A good vocabulary promotes an economy of effort in communication. That's the reason for learning new words. If a concept can be expressed using a paragraph of words, that’s fine, but if a single world that conveys the same idea can be discovered, and if the audience knows that word, it's better to simply use that word. It's no longer necessary to use the whole paragraph. Often just such a word can be found. That’s the value of vocabulary. If everyone knows the word, it can be used to communicate more efficiently.

Most Formal
A good vocabulary promotes an economy of effort in communication. That is the reason for learning new words. If a concept can be expressed using a paragraph of words, yet a single word can be discovered that conveys the same idea, and if the audience knows that word, it is preferable to simply use it. It is no longer necessary to use the whole paragraph to convey the idea. Often just such a word can be discovered. That is the value of vocabulary. If everyone knows the word, its use facilitates communication.


Altogether better way that I haven't thought of
<you fill this one in>

Re: Which one is best?

Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 10:08 pm
by steve
Altogether better way that I haven't thought of
<you fill this one in>
How about:

"If you had a vocabulary as good as mine, you could give really brief answers like those that I am so famous for. Go ahead! I dare you to ask me any question and just see if I can't answer it in less than a 14-lecture series!"

Re: Which one is best?

Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 10:12 pm
by steve
Perry,

Thanks for giving this so much careful consideration. By the way, I think the two more-formal examples fit my style of writing, if not my style of speaking.

Re: Which one is best?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 12:26 pm
by Perry
steve wrote:Go ahead! I dare you to ask me any question and just see if I can't answer it in less than a 14-lecture series!"
Ha! Not sure how I missed seeing your replies. It seems like sometimes posts fall through the cracks of the "view new posts" button.

Anyway, I was terribly naive starting this project, in that I thought the 16 lectures of "Authority" wouldn't be all that daunting. As it turns out, if I finish the way I hope to, I'll have a word count comparable to TWO copies of Tale of Two Cities.

Re: Which one is best?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 6:14 pm
by Jepne
I never really thought about this and am so glad you brought it up. I like the last two also, although I think I am informal in manner - hmmm. Something to think about - thanks so much!

Re: Which one is best?

Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 7:47 am
by psimmond
I think it depends on the subject matter and the audience. For example, I think you should use a third-person informal style if writing about spiritual matters to a general audience made up of believers and unbelievers. On the other hand a second-person formal style is probably appropriate for material that is more technical/meaty and will be read by a narrower audience.

I'm not a writer, so feel free to toss out everything I just said if it makes no sense to you. :lol: