what of the incarnation?

Post Reply
User avatar
_Derek
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:27 am
Location: Marietta GA

Post by _Derek » Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:22 pm

Evangelion wrote:
Jesusfollower wrote:Very amusing, trying to turn it around on me. what you write has been in circulation for many years and definitely not your own thought about scripture. Of course you can not see that since you have a pre conceived notion of what is what. All your assertions are from old when all of these ideas were formed from gnostic thought. All of your counterproductive notions are answered and documented at the sources I give.
Derrek, give up your fight against God, Christ and their people.
Dude, you can't have a proper debate or discussion with people simply by slamming huge great articles in their faces. It doesn't work like that. :?
J.F.,
Dude, you can't have a proper debate or discussion with people simply by slamming huge great articles in their faces. It doesn't work like that.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Derek

Some trust in chariots, and some in horses: but we will remember the name of the LORD our God.
Psalm 20:7

_Jesusfollower
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:11 pm
Location: NW

Post by _Jesusfollower » Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:17 pm

derek, I knew it was too much for you to process, and thanks again. :)
Last edited by _bradshawm on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Paidion
Posts: 944
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:42 pm
Location: Chapple, Ontario

Post by _Paidion » Sun Jul 16, 2006 2:10 pm

I have better things to do than run around in circles with you people I thought I made that plain Homer, same for you Derek...
JF, the attitude you express in you posts is not going to win people over to "the truth" which you express. So what is your purpose in posting these "truths"?

I imagined myself in the position of a seeker who wanted to know the truth about Jesus and His Father. I wanted to see what I could learn from your posts. But I felt such a rejection of all who disagreed with you, I felt I could no longer continue to read, ever if there was a bit of truth there somewhere.

If you are a disciple of Christ, then you will exhibit humility as the Lord Jesus taught His disciples.

Jesus also asked, "Why do you call me 'Lord' and do not the things that I say?" On the day of judgment, there are going to be a lot of surprised people who thought they were disciples, but who will be told, "Get away from me. I never knew you!"
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Paidion
Avatar --- Age 45
"Not one soul will ever be redeemed from hell but by being saved from his sins, from the evil in him." --- George MacDonald

_Jesusfollower
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:11 pm
Location: NW

Post by _Jesusfollower » Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:13 am

That is for sure Paidion. I am sorry that you also have turned away for the truth and feel that I am a bad representative. This again go's back to the 'agree with us a little'. I do agree with you a little. When Jesus was talking with the religious leaders of his time he was as tough as nails with them,
Matthew 23:13
"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men's faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to.
When dealing with the people he was gentle as the Son OF God, I think because they wanted to know the truth. All the attacking definitely sets the moods. Things like, 'don't talk to him he is not a Christian', 'I hope you except this Jesus, in him is eternal life', 'you can not post thorough explanation for people and expect to get across to them'. Think about it, I will. :)
Last edited by _bradshawm on Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Evangelion
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Black Country, UK (ex-Australia)

Post by _Evangelion » Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:58 am

Homer wrote:Did not Jesus exist in another form prior to the incarnation? Phillipians 2:6 "...who, being in form of God..." God, being a spirit, does not have a physical body.
Actually, Philippians 2 is an interesting one because I can't find any reference to pre-existence there. :?

It says that he existed in the form of God; that's fine, and I agree. But it does not say that he pre-existed in the form of God. That's something which people tend to read into the text. It's not actually stated there.

As for being in the form of God; well, so was Adam. :D
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.

Søren Kierkegaard

User avatar
_Derek
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:27 am
Location: Marietta GA

Post by _Derek » Mon Jul 17, 2006 12:39 pm

Ev,
According to Phil. 2 what form (morphe) was Christ in before He took upon Himself the form (morphe) of a servant?

When did He make "himself nothing", and "take the form of a servant"?

Here's the verse for reference: "but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men".


It sure looks to me like the Lord's "becoming nothing" or "emtying of himself" and taking on the form of a servant has a lot to do with His being "born in the likeness of men" according to this passage. And it especially makes sense if before He took on this "form" of a servant He was before in the "form" of God according to this passage.

Could this be when the Word became flesh and dwelt among us? It seems rather likely to me.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Derek

Some trust in chariots, and some in horses: but we will remember the name of the LORD our God.
Psalm 20:7

User avatar
_Evangelion
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Black Country, UK (ex-Australia)

Post by _Evangelion » Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:55 pm

Derek wrote:Ev,
According to Phil. 2 what form (morphe) was Christ in before He took upon Himself the form (morphe) of a servant?
The form of God. :D
When did He make "himself nothing", and "take the form of a servant"?
Paul tells us:
  • Philippians 2:8
    And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
Notice that the act of humbling himself (equated with "making himself nothing") is shown by Paul to be his work on the cross, when he became the perfect sacrifice for sin. Notice also that Paul specifically links this to Christ being "found in fashion as a man"; in other words, made just like other men.

But there's another passage in which he "made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant", and it records an incident shortly before he was taken away by the Sanhedrin:
  • John 13:3-5
    Jesus knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he was come from God, and went to God;
    He riseth from supper, and laid aside his garments; and took a towel, and girded himself.
    After that he poureth water into a basin, and began to wash the disciples' feet, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded.
If this is not an example of Christ humbling himself, making himself nothing and taking on the form of a servant, I don't know what is! :?
Here's the verse for reference: "but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men"

It sure looks to me like the Lord's "becoming nothing" or "emtying of himself" and taking on the form of a servant has a lot to do with His being "born in the likeness of men" according to this passage.

And it especially makes sense if before He took on this "form" of a servant He was before in the "form" of God according to this passage.
I think that explanation simply raises more questions than it answers. Because if his "becoming nothing" and "emptying himself" is all about his being "born in the likeness of men", then what did he empty himself of and in what way did he "become nothing"?
Could this be when the Word became flesh and dwelt among us? It seems rather likely to me.
If that is so, why does Paul not tell us? Why does he make no attempt to link this event with John 1? It seems a curious omission, if the pre-existence of Christ is his theme.

Thus I feel compelled to reiterate my previous point: there is nothing in this entire passage which makes any reference to pre-existence. Not one word! Even the concept of Christ being "in the form of God" is no proof, since we know that Adam himself was made in the image of God and did not pre-exist. It seems to me that the pre-existence of Christ must be proved from other passages; this one simply doesn't do the job.

And on the matter of this "emptying" - would that involve losing the form of God? Is it even possible that Jesus ever lost the form of God? Because the passage never says that he lost it; only that he took upon himself the form of a servant.

Sure, we can argue that the "humbling" was all about being born in the likeness of men. But the apostle Paul actually says it was all about his crucifixion.

I think the reference to being "made in the likeness of men" is simply a reassurance to the readers that he was truly one of us - just as we read in Hebrews 2:17-18.
  • Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.
    For in that he himself hath suffered being
    tempted
    , he is able to succour them that are tempted.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.

Søren Kierkegaard

User avatar
_Paidion
Posts: 944
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:42 pm
Location: Chapple, Ontario

Post by _Paidion » Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:04 am

Here's the verse for reference: "but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men"

It sure looks to me like the Lord's "becoming nothing" or "emtying of himself" and taking on the form of a servant has a lot to do with His being "born in the likeness of men" according to this passage.

And it especially makes sense if before He took on this "form" of a servant He was before in the "form" of God according to this passage.
I think that explanation simply raises more questions than it answers. Because if his "becoming nothing" and "emptying himself" is all about his being "born in the likeness of men", then what did he empty himself of and in what way did he "become nothing"?
The passage speaks for itself:

Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross.
Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:5-11 RSV


He was in the form of God, but was not equal with God even then, nor did He seek equality with God. But having been generated as the Son of God before all ages, another One exactly like His Father, "the exact expression of His essence", He "emptied Himself", that is, divested Himself of all of His divine attributes, and was born "in the likeness of men". And so He "was found in human form". Why would Paul state this, if He had not pre-existed? He would have always been in human form. Such a statement as "was found in human form" would never have been used concerning any other man.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Paidion
Avatar --- Age 45
"Not one soul will ever be redeemed from hell but by being saved from his sins, from the evil in him." --- George MacDonald

_Jesusfollower
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:11 pm
Location: NW

Post by _Jesusfollower » Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:25 am

Paidion, I guess my reason for posting here is to proclaim truth and get my brothers and sisters in the body to start thinking. The passage you sited has to do with truth, the truth always comes first with our Lord, I feel. That is all. I do have an edge on me that is for sure being an ignorant and unlearned man, I am sorry I torqued you off.
Last edited by _bradshawm on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Evangelion
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Black Country, UK (ex-Australia)

Post by _Evangelion » Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:24 pm

Paidion wrote:
Here's the verse for reference: "but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men"

It sure looks to me like the Lord's "becoming nothing" or "emtying of himself" and taking on the form of a servant has a lot to do with His being "born in the likeness of men" according to this passage.

And it especially makes sense if before He took on this "form" of a servant He was before in the "form" of God according to this passage.
I think that explanation simply raises more questions than it answers. Because if his "becoming nothing" and "emptying himself" is all about his being "born in the likeness of men", then what did he empty himself of and in what way did he "become nothing"?
The passage speaks for itself:

Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross.
Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:5-11 RSV


He was in the form of God, but was not equal with God even then, nor did He seek equality with God.
So are you telling me that he lost the form of God somehow? Then what was that form, and how did he lose it? If Jesus is God, you're telling me that he lost his own form. But can God really lose His own form? How does that work, exactly - and where in Scripture do we find this idea?
But having been generated as the Son of God before all ages, another One exactly like His Father, "the exact expression of His essence", He "emptied Himself", that is, divested Himself of all of His divine attributes, and was born "in the likeness of men". And so He "was found in human form".
Mate, that's a hell of a lot to read into a very simple passage of Scripture.

Where are we told that ie was "generated as the Son of God before all ages"?

Where are we told that he was "the exact expression of His essence"?

Where are told that he "divested Himself of all of His divine attributes"?

You are simply importing all of these ideas into the text. There is absolutely nothing which suggests them, or even supports them.
Why would Paul state this, if He had not pre-existed? He would have always been in human form. Such a statement as "was found in human form" would never have been used concerning any other man.
I've already told you why he said it. Paul is reassuring his readers that Christ was truly one of us - just as we read in Hebrews 2:17-18.
  • Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.
    For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted.
Since Paul had also told his readers that Jesus was in the image of God, it makes sense to remind them that this image of God was nothing which took away (or added to) his humanity.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.

Søren Kierkegaard

Post Reply

Return to “Miscellaneous”