Heb 8:7-13

User avatar
_Father_of_five
Posts: 213
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:37 pm
Location: Texas USA

Post by _Father_of_five » Sun Mar 12, 2006 10:00 am

Sean wrote:
Father_of_five wrote:
Allyn wrote:Just a quick reply for you Todd. Steve teaches that under the old covenant the people only had the priest to teach them the ways. This ceased once the gospel came into effect under the New Covenant. We all now equally have access to the teachings of the Gospel not only through the word, but through the Holy Spirit.
Allyn,

You and Sean and Steve could very well be correct. If so, then the "all" in verse 11 is referring to "all christians." If you try to reconcile the verse with the orthodox veiw then it could mean nothing else. If however, someone were to espouse universalism, he could easily take it to mean "all flesh."

Todd
Why would God give any warning or interact in any way with us while in the flesh if the "true" salvation comes to all after death?

Why is there a condition of repentance from dead works and a renewal by the Spirit if salvation comes to all?

To be honest, annihilation makes more sense.

All are reconciled but there is a condition to this. Faith, not like the demons who believe and shudder, but a true faith.

I believe God does it this way to test you. There is no better way to test someones love than to put them in a place of temptation and then offer them a way out that requires denial of the world around them and an obidience to and invisible God.

That's why those who know the truth, but would rather live it up now in denial only store up God's wrath against them.

This is a passage that comes to mind:
2Th 1:5 This is evidence of the righteous judgment of God, that you may be considered worthy of the kingdom of God, for which you are also suffering--
2Th 1:6 since indeed God considers it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you,
2Th 1:7 and to grant relief to you who are afflicted as well as to us, when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with his mighty angels
2Th 1:8 in flaming fire, inflicting vengeance on those who do not know God and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus.
2Th 1:9 They will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might,

2Th 1:10 when he comes on that day to be glorified in his saints, and to be marveled at among all who have believed, because our testimony to you was believed.

It seems that there is a seperation of believers and unbelievers. You can point to the passage that says 'every knee will bow and every tongue will confess'. I agree, this is after death/at the resurrection. The unbelievers will confess the truth, but that doesn't make them a true believer any more than a demon is a believer just by confessing Jesus. There is a difference. I can convince someone that Jesus died for the sins of all, but even if they believe it as a historical fact, they still have to be born again. So people are going to admit the truth on the day of judgement, but if God let them go, they would just go back to sinning again, because that is their desire. Someone who is saved still does commit sin, but it pains them and they look foreward to relief. An unsaved person doesn't want God under any circumstances. Think about it, God has offered His Son as payment, and people trample it, because they don't want it. I believe this is the way God proves who honestly love Him.
Sean,

Thank you for your post. I agree with you that there are many verses which make believing in universalism difficult. The one you quote is one of them. However, the version you are quoting from adds the word "away" when it says "away from the presence of the Lord..." It is the presence of the Lord and the brightness of his coming that does the destroying. But what is destroyed? Is it the entire spirit, soul and body?...or perhaps it is the sinfulness of man that is destroyed.

I do agree with you that annihilation makes more sense than never-ending torture, but why resurrect the unjust just to destroy them again. That makes no sense either to me. As Paul said, "he that is dead is freed from sin" (Rom 6:7). And how can death truely be destroyed if many are annihilated?

I believe it is possible that there are two ways through Christ into the Everlasting Kingdom. The first one is willing (in this life), through faith in him. Those who follow this path enjoy the fruit of the spirit and everlasting life in the presence of Jesus. The other is through the cleansing fire of judgment and wrath of God. Paul says that this way is accompanied by "tribulation and anguish" (Rom 2:9). The verse you quoted says that these will be "punished" with everlasting destruction. All punishment is meant to bring about a correction. The fact that it is everlasting could mean that the "effect" of the punishment is everlasting, or, in other words, there has been a total reformation that has taken place. That which was sinful and disobedient has been destroyed. It is possible that those who are in this latter group do not have the same status in the Everlasting Kingdom. Perhaps they have no "inheritance" yet still enjoy the praise of Christ, their redeemer.

So why even consider such things? Because there are many verses which seem to indicate Christ's death served to reconcile the whole world (2 Cor 5:19, Col 1:20, Rom 11:15, Rom 5:8-11). That he was the propitiation for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2:2). And that God will be merciful to everyone (Rom 11:32). And that his devine purpose is to gather together all things in Christ (Eph 1:10).

To deny the gathering together of ALL things in Christ could be to admit that even though Christ died for the sins of the whole world he was only able to save a few and that Satan, in the end, is the greater victor. No, this cannot be. At least that is how I see it at the present time.

Rev 5:13
And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever.

Todd
Last edited by mgarrett on Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Paidion
Posts: 944
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:42 pm
Location: Chapple, Ontario

Post by _Paidion » Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:01 am

I believe it is possible that there are two ways through Christ into the Everlasting Kingdom. The first one is willing through faith in him. Those who follow this path enjoy the fruit of the spirit and everlasting life in the presence of Jesus. The other is through the cleansing fire of judgment and wrath of God.
I believe there is only one way, and one requirement ------ repentance and submission to the authority of Christ.

Whether we repent now, or later in Gehenna, it is only through Christ that we can be saved.

Acts 4:12 "... there is salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must be saved."
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Paidion
Avatar --- Age 45
"Not one soul will ever be redeemed from hell but by being saved from his sins, from the evil in him." --- George MacDonald

_STEVE7150
Posts: 894
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 8:38 pm

Post by _STEVE7150 » Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:42 am

I do agree with you that annihilation makes more sense than never-ending torture, but why resurrect the unjust just to destroy them again. That makes no sense either to me. As Paul said, "he that is dead is freed from sin" (Rom 6:7).

Annihalation would make sense if it is after a period of time that God allows for repentance and maybe restitution and bowing the knee to Christ. God is long suffering and patient but not eternally and there may be some who won't repent or who have blasphemed the Holy Spirit.
Speaking of which it seems to me that Jesus in saying "blaspheming of the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven in this age OR THE AGE TO COME" is in effect saying that in the age to come there is forgiveness available to those who HAVE NOT blasphemed the Holy Spirit.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Father_of_five
Posts: 213
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:37 pm
Location: Texas USA

Post by _Father_of_five » Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:37 pm

STEVE7150 wrote:God is long suffering and patient but not eternally
Lam 3:22-24
22 The steadfast love of the LORD never ceases;
his mercies never come to an end;
23 they are new every morning;
great is your faithfulness.
24 "The LORD is my portion," says my soul,
"therefore I will hope in him."


Todd
Last edited by mgarrett on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_brody_in_ga
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 8:55 pm
Location: Richland Ga

...

Post by _brody_in_ga » Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:56 pm

Hey Father of five,

Why would Jesus say of Judas Iscariot, "It had been better if he had never been born"? Mar 14:21 The Son of man indeed goeth, as it is written of him: but woe to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! good were it for that man if he had never been born."

If your view is correct, he will be reconciled to God so it really didn't matter if he was born. Also, how does "eternal judgement" play into your view. Thanks.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
For our God is a consuming fire.
Hebrews 12:29

User avatar
_Les Wright
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 11:32 am

Post by _Les Wright » Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:57 pm

Father of five,

Not to pick on you, but to follow up with what brody_in_ga is saying, why would the author of Hebrews warn against falling away so strongly in chp 6, if we'd be reconciled in the end through Jesus anyhow?

It seems inconsistent with the author's theology to me.

Tx
Les
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Father_of_five
Posts: 213
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:37 pm
Location: Texas USA

Re: ...

Post by _Father_of_five » Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:07 pm

brody_in_ga wrote:Hey Father of five,

Why would Jesus say of Judas Iscariot, "It had been better if he had never been born"? Mar 14:21 The Son of man indeed goeth, as it is written of him: but woe to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! good were it for that man if he had never been born."

If your view is correct, he will be reconciled to God so it really didn't matter if he was born. Also, how does "eternal judgement" play into your view. Thanks.
Brody,

You ask very good questions. I will suggest a possible answer. Perhaps Paidion or Steve7150 can give a better one.

The same Jesus who said, "good were it for that man if he had never been born," also said, "Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do" (Luke 23:34). Perhaps Jesus was just commenting on the fact that Judas would be remembered throughout history for betraying his own savior - what a sad memorial that is. Also, it was prophesied about the bitter demise that awaited Judas in Matt 27:1-10.

You asked also about "eternal judgment." I am not certain which verse you are referring to but my answer would probably be similar to the one I gave about "everlasting destruction" above. Here is the quote.
The verse you quoted says that these will be "punished" with everlasting destruction. All punishment is meant to bring about a correction. The fact that it is everlasting could mean that the "effect" of the punishment is everlasting, or, in other words, there has been a total reformation that has taken place. That which was sinful and disobedient has been destroyed.
Todd
Last edited by mgarrett on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Father_of_five
Posts: 213
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:37 pm
Location: Texas USA

Post by _Father_of_five » Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:38 pm

Les Wright wrote:Father of five,

Not to pick on you, but to follow up with what brody_in_ga is saying, why would the author of Hebrews warn against falling away so strongly in chp 6, if we'd be reconciled in the end through Jesus anyhow?

It seems inconsistent with the author's theology to me.

Tx
Les
Les,

The warning in Hebrews 6 is just one of many warnings to flee from God's wrath. Paul said, "Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men" (2 Cor 5:11). Paul devoted his life to persuading others to repent and obey the gospel. The wrath of God is to be avoided.

Todd
Last edited by mgarrett on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

User avatar
_Paidion
Posts: 944
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:42 pm
Location: Chapple, Ontario

Post by _Paidion » Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:58 pm

Todd, before I could answer the question as to why Jesus would say that it would have been better for Judas never to have been born, I think you answered it yourself in your last post.

When Judas is raised, he will have to endure correction in Gehenna, perhaps for long ages. If Judas had never been born, he would not have had to go through this painful time.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Paidion
Avatar --- Age 45
"Not one soul will ever be redeemed from hell but by being saved from his sins, from the evil in him." --- George MacDonald

_STEVE7150
Posts: 894
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 8:38 pm

Post by _STEVE7150 » Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:19 pm

Father of five,

Not to pick on you, but to follow up with what brody_in_ga is saying, why would the author of Hebrews warn against falling away so strongly in chp 6, if we'd be reconciled in the end through Jesus anyhow?

It seems inconsistent with the author's theology to me.



Because all unbelievers end up in the lake of fire which is a very unpleasent place to be but according to scripture as i understand it, is not eternal. There are dozens of statements indicating either "all" or at least most will be ultimately saved but far better to be saved in this life.
There are many statements that indicate salvation is possible after this life but one that recently occured to me was this "The sin of blaspheming the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven in this age or the age to come" , so then by default Jesus is saying a sin that is not blaspheming the Holy Spirit can be forgiven in the age to come.
Anyway this topic is discussed in detail in the thread "Alternative views of hell."
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:

Post Reply

Return to “Miscellaneous”