I am blood bought and born again...
I who was once dead in trespasses have been
made alive.....By grace I have been saved.
Are you a heretic?
The Nestorians denied the real unon between the divine and human natures in Christ, making it rather a moral than an organic one. They refused therefore to attribute to the resultant unity the attributes of each nature, and regarded Christ as a man in very near relation to God. Thus they virtually held to two natures and two persons, instead of two natures in one person.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
Paidion
Avatar --- Age 45
"Not one soul will ever be redeemed from hell but by being saved from his sins, from the evil in him." --- George MacDonald
Avatar --- Age 45
"Not one soul will ever be redeemed from hell but by being saved from his sins, from the evil in him." --- George MacDonald
I took the quiz—and guess what! Calvinists can no longer call me "semi-Pelagian"! I am, in fact, 67% Pelagian!
On the other hand, I am also 67% Chalcedon compliant—which is the opposite of Pelagian.
I think the scoring must somehow be off (I thought I noticed a "hanging chad")—or else I am just theologically schizophrenic.
My Eastern Orthodox friend said today that I am a crypto-Nestorian. I don't know about the "crypto" part, my Nestorian quotient was 42%.
On the other hand, I am also 67% Chalcedon compliant—which is the opposite of Pelagian.
I think the scoring must somehow be off (I thought I noticed a "hanging chad")—or else I am just theologically schizophrenic.
My Eastern Orthodox friend said today that I am a crypto-Nestorian. I don't know about the "crypto" part, my Nestorian quotient was 42%.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
In Jesus,
Steve
Steve
-
_Evangelion
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Black Country, UK (ex-Australia)
I'm a Socinian - wahey!!! 
It's very well written, though I think he needs to refine a few of his questions and add a few more heresies. He should add Biblical Unitarianism (but distinguish it from Rationalist Unitarianism, Unitarian Universalism and Socinianism) and write some specific questions for it. He should also find some way of including Ontological Subordinationism.
Of course, I'm actually Unitarian (not Socinian) but since this guy doesn't appear to know the difference between the two, Socinianism is the most accurate result I'm going to get on this quiz.You scored as Socinianism.
You are a Socinian. You deny the doctrine of the Trinity because you think God exists in a simplified unity. Since this makes the Incarnation impossible, you see Christ's work as simply exemplary.
Socinianism 67%
Pelagianism 58%
Monarchianism 33%
Docetism 0%
Arianism 0%
Apollanarian 0%
Adoptionist 0%
Donatism 0%
Monophysitism 0%
Chalcedon compliant 0%
Nestorianism 0%
Albigensianism 0%
Modalism 0%
Gnosticism 0%
It's very well written, though I think he needs to refine a few of his questions and add a few more heresies. He should add Biblical Unitarianism (but distinguish it from Rationalist Unitarianism, Unitarian Universalism and Socinianism) and write some specific questions for it. He should also find some way of including Ontological Subordinationism.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.
Søren Kierkegaard
Søren Kierkegaard
Chalcedon compliant 100% (whew)!!!
Pelagianism 83% (and to think I didn't even have to try).....
Monophysitism 75% (the questions were monotonous)!
Adoptionist 33% (yeah, right, they said that about Paul too)!
Monarchianism 25% (where'd they get this?)....
Nestorianism 25% (the Word was made flesh, where's the problem?)
Arianism 17% (I'll say I'm "that" to the next JWs who come to the door)
Donatism 8% (I'm a Memorialist, N/A, imo)
The rest 0%.......um, like, Gnosticism? I knew that!
Pelagianism 83% (and to think I didn't even have to try).....
Monophysitism 75% (the questions were monotonous)!
Adoptionist 33% (yeah, right, they said that about Paul too)!
Monarchianism 25% (where'd they get this?)....
Nestorianism 25% (the Word was made flesh, where's the problem?)
Arianism 17% (I'll say I'm "that" to the next JWs who come to the door)
Donatism 8% (I'm a Memorialist, N/A, imo)
The rest 0%.......um, like, Gnosticism? I knew that!
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
I began the quiz, but after about 3 or 4 questions in, I realized the silliness of many of the questions. Maybe that's the point.TK wrote: i didnt understand 3/4 of the questions.
I didn't finish the quiz so I rated:
100% - simpleton for Jesus.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
I deserve to be excommunicated in the year A.D. 417. So you all are to shun me.Pelagianism 75%
Chalcedon compliant 67%
Adoptionist 50%
Monophysitism 50%
Apollanarian 42%
Nestorianism 33%
Socinianism 33%
Donatism 25%
Gnosticism 17%
Monarchianism 8%
Modalism 8%
Arianism 8%
Docetism 8%
Albigensianism 0%
The questions were somewhat ambiguous. To almost every question, I answered: "It really depends." Can someone define some of the questions so meself can be brought back into the fold? It is lonely out here in the cold...
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
Agape,
loaves
"And when he had taken the five loaves and the two fishes, he looked up to heaven, and blessed, and brake the loaves...And they did all eat, and were filled" (Mark 6:41-42)
loaves
"And when he had taken the five loaves and the two fishes, he looked up to heaven, and blessed, and brake the loaves...And they did all eat, and were filled" (Mark 6:41-42)
i agree loaves- the questions were trickier than the bar exam. i still dont know what a chalcedon is!
TK
TK
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
"Were not our hearts burning within us? (Lk 24:32)
Hmmmmmm, I believe it has something to do with R.J. Rushdoony and his three volumes about Biblical law; which one can use as weight-lifting substitutions.TK wrote:i agree loaves- the questions were trickier than the bar exam. i still dont know what a chalcedon is!
TK
Oh! Also, there was something about the Council of Chalcedon being of some significance:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Chalcedon
other than that, to us guys on the street, it really doesn't mean a whole lot. My two cents, at least.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm, edited 0 times in total.
Reason:
Reason:
Agape,
loaves
"And when he had taken the five loaves and the two fishes, he looked up to heaven, and blessed, and brake the loaves...And they did all eat, and were filled" (Mark 6:41-42)
loaves
"And when he had taken the five loaves and the two fishes, he looked up to heaven, and blessed, and brake the loaves...And they did all eat, and were filled" (Mark 6:41-42)