The Naked Gospel (new book)
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:48 pm
Hosted by Steve Gregg
https://theos.org:443/forum/
Could be an interesting read -- from the article, I'd at least have to say a hearty AMEN to the basic premise and have no shock at all in most of the points highlighted in the article, though I certainly disagree with part of it (or at least the rationale).
Language indeed matters, and I agree with the premise that we're so inclined to "religion" that we generally hold adherence to our favorite Christianistic tenets and phrases and notions (and even view of the institutional church) above the actual simple (though hard) spiritual Truths that Jesus brought to us.
I happen to agree that OT tithing, 10 Commandments (per se), and ceremonial laws are no longer applicable to the Christian.
I strongly disagree (as does Scripture) with the notion that we don't need to ask forgiveness -- that's hardly a new concept, though, and stems I believe from a particular form of ultra-dispensationalism.
As to the 10 Commandments, I would actually agree with the conclusion but might disagree a bit with the logic (it's hard to tell where he's coming from in the article but it does hint at my position). I personally think they don't "apply" anymore not because Jesus "did it all" and "that's that," (as some have suggested) but instead because the greater commandments Christ brought subsume the moral laws to which the Old Testament was but a shadow and because the Spirit enables us to do far deeper what the moral commands in the 10 Commandments only hinted at. Basically, if we live through the Spirit according to Christ's teachings, then the 10 Commandments are taken care of as a result, and were elaborated on by Christ in his Sermon on the Mount and elsewhere. The ceremonial aspects of the law (including some of the 10 Commandments) are indeed fulfilled completely in Christ and wholly irrelevant other than understanding aspects of God and Christ's character in their fulfillment, but the moral laws are fulfilled by Christ "in" and "through" us.
I sure wish clean "thinking" naturally leads to clean living, but I think it must be more intentional/purposeful than that (striving to continually walk in the Spirit to equip our intentions and guide those intentional steps), and the NT is full of warnings to guard against such a notion that we can just "think good thoughts." That is why I'm so excited about the study on the Sermon on the Mount and hope that we get more interest.
In general, it sounds like he's "heading the right direction," but it sounds a bit simplistic (and perhaps just a bit naive and ignorant) -- as to the tithe, I agree again with the "conclusion" and he's "close" but "oh so far away" on the rationale. Historically, the tithe was simply ceremonial and designed specifically to support the Levitical system which was not only done away with, but which was also crushed as the Lord came in judgment against Jerusalem and destroyed (as predicted) the sustained Temple system in AD70. The Levites were to get a share of the bounty to support the temple and temple worship primarily because they were the tribe not given a land portion but were instead dedicated to Temple service. Some say the "church" is the modern equivalent of the Temple, but it's more like the synagogue, not the Temple. Individual people of the Body of Christ (collectively) are now the corollary fulfillment of the Temple, not institutions or buildings. I also don't agree that we are to just give according to what we "want," but that we are to be consciously and truly aware in our hearts and minds that it all belongs to God and that we are but stewards and to truly be "willing" when called on by circumstances and the Lord's leading to give any amount that is loving as needed and according to the leading of the Spirit -- that's not exactly the same thing as "giving according to my wants." That notion actually betrays a leaning towards "easy grace" instead of a spiritual life being led by Christ's teachings and the Holy Spirit's leading.
I'm in agreement with you Darin. I would like to hear him flesh out this point though.I strongly disagree (as does Scripture) with the notion that we don't need to ask forgiveness -- that's hardly a new concept, though, and stems I believe from a particular form of ultra-dispensationalism.
What happens if a Christian doesnt ask for forgiveness?I strongly disagree (as does Scripture) with the notion that we don't need to ask forgiveness
Luk 11:1 And it came to pass, that, as he was praying in a certain place, when he ceased, one of his disciples said unto him, Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples.TK wrote:Darin wrote:
What happens if a Christian doesnt ask for forgiveness?I strongly disagree (as does Scripture) with the notion that we don't need to ask forgiveness
I thought Jesus took care of the sin problem once for all time.
Now, I am being a tad argumentative, and I agree that we should CONFESS our sins, which would be in keeping with repentance, but havent we already been forgiven, even for sins we havent committed yet?
TK
I think an illustration from marriage (my most common default) may clarify this. When you get married, you promise to stay faithful and together "for better or for worse." In a sense this is like saying "I forgive you in advance (in the sense of not rejecting you) for everything wrong that you may do for the rest of our lives together." Yet, as Suzana said, requests for forgiveness when offenses are committed is not ruled out by this arrangement, and they show that forgiveness is not taken for granted.What happens if a Christian doesnt ask for forgiveness?
I thought Jesus took care of the sin problem once for all time.