Christians and War
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 6:23 pm
I thought I would open this can o' worms.
"Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, then My servants would be fighting, that I might not be delivered up to the Jews; but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm." John 18:36 NASB
Is this a prescription against Christians joining militaries of the world? Much of the support given by Christians who endorse believers joining the military is derived from Old Testament themes of God leading Israel into war, and being an advocate of the defenseless. I could post those relevant verses, but in the interest of my own time, and the trust that many of you are familiar with the arguments, I won't. Some also point to men of the Old Testament who were warriors.
The New Testament arguments I have seen are derived from Christ's character and concern for the innocent, and references to Romans 13:1-5. " Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. Therefore he who resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same; for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath upon the one who practices evil. Wherefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience' sake." I don't think this is a sound pro-Christian soldier argument, but have seen it tossed about.
Also, the common arguments that I have read refer to Jesus not being a pacifist (this I take as a jab against pacifism, but I think deflects the argument), because He drove moneychangers out of the temple; that Jesus is seen in Revelation 19:12-15 as having "eyes are a flame of fire, and upon His head are many diadems; and He has a name written upon Him which no one knows except Himself. And He is clothed with a robe dipped in blood; and His name is called The Word of God. And the armies which are in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, were following Him on white horses. And from His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may smite the nations; and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the wine press of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty."
So too, I'm reading arguments in favor of Christian participation in war that mention the references to centurions in the New Testament as having commendable traits, coupled with the various references to the church and Christian being an army and a soldier, respectively (Eph. 6; 1 Cor. 9:7; 2 Tim. 2:4, etc.).
To keep focused and not get bogged down into a discussion about an individual Christian's right to defend himself and others, should a Christian not join the military because the New Covenant principles demand this, or are Christians free to be convinced in their own minds concerning this issue? If I have set up a false dichotomy, please inform me. I admit to my own dimness.
JD
"Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, then My servants would be fighting, that I might not be delivered up to the Jews; but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm." John 18:36 NASB
Is this a prescription against Christians joining militaries of the world? Much of the support given by Christians who endorse believers joining the military is derived from Old Testament themes of God leading Israel into war, and being an advocate of the defenseless. I could post those relevant verses, but in the interest of my own time, and the trust that many of you are familiar with the arguments, I won't. Some also point to men of the Old Testament who were warriors.
The New Testament arguments I have seen are derived from Christ's character and concern for the innocent, and references to Romans 13:1-5. " Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. Therefore he who resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same; for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath upon the one who practices evil. Wherefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience' sake." I don't think this is a sound pro-Christian soldier argument, but have seen it tossed about.
Also, the common arguments that I have read refer to Jesus not being a pacifist (this I take as a jab against pacifism, but I think deflects the argument), because He drove moneychangers out of the temple; that Jesus is seen in Revelation 19:12-15 as having "eyes are a flame of fire, and upon His head are many diadems; and He has a name written upon Him which no one knows except Himself. And He is clothed with a robe dipped in blood; and His name is called The Word of God. And the armies which are in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, were following Him on white horses. And from His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may smite the nations; and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the wine press of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty."
So too, I'm reading arguments in favor of Christian participation in war that mention the references to centurions in the New Testament as having commendable traits, coupled with the various references to the church and Christian being an army and a soldier, respectively (Eph. 6; 1 Cor. 9:7; 2 Tim. 2:4, etc.).
To keep focused and not get bogged down into a discussion about an individual Christian's right to defend himself and others, should a Christian not join the military because the New Covenant principles demand this, or are Christians free to be convinced in their own minds concerning this issue? If I have set up a false dichotomy, please inform me. I admit to my own dimness.
JD