Logistics of Christ's death
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:25 pm
Growing up I had read the Chronicles of Narnia, and was told similarly of Jesus' work.
In CS Lewis' writing, Aslan hands himself over to the wicked queen to be killed, and in the traditional view of Christ's sacrifice I always heard he had similarly handed himself over to Satan for a time before he triumphed. Somehow, it is believed that Satan was owed something, just like the queen was owed a life, and Christ and Aslan stepped in to present themselves for what the enemy was rightfully claiming.
However, I now struggle to see it since I understand it was God's law that called for justice and blood, not any claim of Satan's. It was God who was owed something, not the enemy. Thus, while I've heard from Christians that claim Christ satisfied Satan's claim to us, and submitted himself to Satan for a time, it seems more likely that Christ satisfied what we owed God. Satan has no rightful claim to anything, he (and his forces) was just an instrument that was used to perform the actions that God's righteousness required.
It seems Christian's give rights to Satan that he does not have when they claim he has a right to something that is owed him which Christ had to meet.
Do you guys see my dilemma? I haven't figured out how to word it best, but it just seems as if the Narnia idea of Christ's death makes no sense as some Christian's would picture it that Satan had a right to anything. It was God who had a right (was owed) justice.
In CS Lewis' writing, Aslan hands himself over to the wicked queen to be killed, and in the traditional view of Christ's sacrifice I always heard he had similarly handed himself over to Satan for a time before he triumphed. Somehow, it is believed that Satan was owed something, just like the queen was owed a life, and Christ and Aslan stepped in to present themselves for what the enemy was rightfully claiming.
However, I now struggle to see it since I understand it was God's law that called for justice and blood, not any claim of Satan's. It was God who was owed something, not the enemy. Thus, while I've heard from Christians that claim Christ satisfied Satan's claim to us, and submitted himself to Satan for a time, it seems more likely that Christ satisfied what we owed God. Satan has no rightful claim to anything, he (and his forces) was just an instrument that was used to perform the actions that God's righteousness required.
It seems Christian's give rights to Satan that he does not have when they claim he has a right to something that is owed him which Christ had to meet.
Do you guys see my dilemma? I haven't figured out how to word it best, but it just seems as if the Narnia idea of Christ's death makes no sense as some Christian's would picture it that Satan had a right to anything. It was God who had a right (was owed) justice.