We are saved from WHAT?

Man, Sin, & Salvation
User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: We are saved from WHAT?

Post by Paidion » Mon Apr 01, 2013 9:28 pm

Dseusy wrote:Sin is lawlessness so if we start with this definition of sin we can agree that any violation of God's law is a sin. Therefore, if you claim that you can be ACTUALLY righteous, you must accept that you claim you adhere to all of God's law.
Your conclusion after "therefore" does not follow. You seem to be saying that no one can be righteous. How then can you receive eternal life? By accepting Christ and continuing in sin? Not according to Romans 2:

For He will render to everyone according to his works.

To those who by perseverance in well-doing seek for glory and honour and immortality,
He will give eternal life, but for those who are self-seeking and are not persuaded by the truth,
but are persuaded by unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury.

Affliction and anguish for every person who does evil, but glory and honour and well-being for
every one who does good... for God shows no partiality.


Let's look at "Sin is lawlessness" in context:

Every one who commits sin is guilty of lawlessness; sin is lawlessness. You know that He appeared to take away sins, and in Him there is no sin. No one who abides in him sins; no one who sins has either seen him or known him. Little children, let no one deceive you. he who does right is righteous, as He is righteous. He who commits sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. the reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil. No one born of God commits sin; for God’s nature abides in him, and he cannot sin because he is born of God. By this it may be seen who are the children of God, and who are the children of the devil: whoever does not do right is not of God, nor he who does not love his brother. (I John 3:4-10)

John wrote that he who does right is righteous as He is righteous. If we can work righteousness, we must be healed of our inner condition which is subject to sin. Christ died in order to heal us and save us from ourselves. According to John, anyone who practises sin is of the devil, and anyone born of God cannot practise sin. We need to saved from sin, and this is why Christ died according to the following passages:

I Peter 2:24 He himself endured our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed.
II Corinthians 5:15 And he died for all, that those who live might live no longer for themselves but for him who for their sake died and was raised.
Romans 14:9 For to this end Christ died and lived again, that he might be Lord both of the dead and of the living.
Titus 2:14 who gave himself for us to redeem us from all iniquity and to purify for himself a people of his own who are zealous for good deeds.
Heb 9:26 ...he has appeared once for all at the end of the age to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself.


If we think God is going to accept us because we prayed "the sinner's prayer" or "accepted Christ as our personal Saviour" or "trusted in the finished work of Christ" and have not been healed of our sinful natures and been delivered from sin, we are in for a rude awakening some day.
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

dseusy
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 5:05 pm

Re: We are saved from WHAT?

Post by dseusy » Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:19 am

Paidion wrote:You seem to be saying that no one can be righteous. How then can you receive eternal life?
That is exactly what I am saying. With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.

Ecclesiastes 7:20

Romans 3:20-24
"Therefore by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified in His sight, for by the law is the knowledge of sin. But now the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe. For there is no difference; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus"

Romans 4:4-5

Freely. Not earned, but given. However, you are right... if you are found under law He will render to you according to your works.

Paidion, you seem to be saying that you are righteous. The law requires that you love God and others... not the feeling, but the action of love- being patient, kind, and rejoicing with the truth (even when it exposes you). Love never fails. Does your love ever fail? Mine does and it breaks my heart, but God is assuring me of His love- despite me.

You claim to be saved based upon your deeds. You believe you have to change the sinful nature (which the original language points out is not a mysterious entity, but the physical flesh which lusts against God). This is what LDS teach, and many other world religions.

I claim to be a sinner in need of a Savior. This is what sets Christ apart from the rest... God doesn't compromise the standard of righteousness, He appeases it by fulfilling the law and crediting us this gift- if we will receive it.

I don't uphold sin. I try not to ignore sin. I uphold the law and keep it close to me- it leads us to Christ.

Romans 2 is in the context of the rest of the book... it follows Paul's explanation of law, conviction, sin, faith, confession, salvation, joy.

I believe I have been saved from my sinful nature because I have been given a new spirit and this life is hidden in Christ... my flesh, however, is still corrupt. I only know this because I have spent much time being a doer of the word, and not a hearer only because I don't want to be deceived. If I was just a hearer of the word and not a doer, I would forget what kind of man I am. But by looking into the perfect law of liberty and continuing in it, I can compare my deeds to God's law and perceive the gap. As I have focused on my "planks" the gap between my performance and God's righteous law has grown bigger and bigger.

1 John 1:8-10
"If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us."

You didn't answer my question,

"Do you adhere to all of God's law?"

dseusy
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 5:05 pm

Re: We are saved from WHAT?

Post by dseusy » Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:21 am

We have to be righteous to inherit eternal life, but the question is... how do we get there- keep looking intently into the law and do it, and all the while remember that God is love.

User avatar
jeremiah
Posts: 339
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 6:58 pm
Location: Mount Carroll, IL
Contact:

Re: We are saved from WHAT?

Post by jeremiah » Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:33 am

good morning dseusy,

brother your posts seem a little patronizing. if you are speaking as if we are not yet in Christ, please reconsider such a hasty conclusion. We hold the grace of God no less foundational (nor less dear) than you. let me assure you that any 'works', or their maintenance defended in this thread as being essential to our walk with God are wholly founded, kept, and understood only by the power of his resurrection! not our own. no one is claiming what you say we are claiming, i think you've misrepresented exactly what is being defended by this thread. please reconsider.

some thing you said I think can beautifully close the perceived gap between what you seem to think is being claimed and what is being claimed. I consider the reality of: in Christ, I have been resurrected from the grave of sin to then walk alive unto righteousness, to be spoken in exactly the same spirit of faith with which you said:
...
I only know this because I have spent much time being a doer of the word, and not a hearer only because I don't want to be deceived. If I was just a hearer of the word and not a doer, I would forget what kind of man I am.
shall we conclude you trust in your own sufficiency to be a doer of the word? why then do you think we trust in ours?
grace and peace is with us...
Also unto thee, O Lord, belongeth mercy: for thou renderest to every man according to his work.

dwilkins
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: We are saved from WHAT?

Post by dwilkins » Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:05 pm

dseusy wrote:We have to be righteous to inherit eternal life, but the question is... how do we get there- keep looking intently into the law and do it, and all the while remember that God is love.
I'll point out again that I think a great deal of confusion is created by using "righteous" or "righteousness" instead of "justified" in many verses associated with justification. In fact, I think it's at the core of the miscalculation that is Calvinism. Going forward I think it would be helpful in each example of either of these words if there is some explanation given for why one of the words is chosen over the other.

Doug

User avatar
jeremiah
Posts: 339
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 6:58 pm
Location: Mount Carroll, IL
Contact:

Re: We are saved from WHAT?

Post by jeremiah » Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:36 pm

hello doug,

i'm just not seeing the dichotomy you're insisting is there by replacing righteousness with justification. if i read romans 6 with both justification and also keeping in mind that paul has before spoke of a corporate justification, i still see him going further to our individual response to all this. it's not at all based entirely on simply reading the word 'righteousness' and then thinking, oh ok so this is all about my personal walk, wow. no. would you say there is zero personal application of the work of God found in romans 6?

would you expound on what you're calling confusion?

grace and peace.
Also unto thee, O Lord, belongeth mercy: for thou renderest to every man according to his work.

dwilkins
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: We are saved from WHAT?

Post by dwilkins » Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:30 pm

Jeremiah,

I'd appreciate it if you'd use normal English conventions like capital letters in your posts. It would make them much easier to read.

The difference between righteousness and justification is important. They both come from the same root word and are only translated the way they are because of a given translator's theological bias. Though there is some overlap in the concepts (it is assumed that people who are justified will generally act righteously) righteousness is focused more on moral perfection. Someone who is perfectly righteous is perfectly moral. This is an individual trait that cannot, according to any normal use of the word, be transferred between people. Justification is a legal term that starts with the idea of acquittal. In a national context it is associated with being declared the good guys vs. other nations who are then defined as the bad guys. For someone to be righteous is for that person to have perfect individual morality. For someone to be justified is for that person to be acquitted of any allegation and declared to be one of the good guys. Righteousness cannot be transmitted but justification can. The judge, faithfully carrying out his duty, can declare someone justified. He can't declare someone righteous.

Assuming that my definitions above are basically correct (and you can find a full description of this paradigm in "What Paul Really Said" by Wright), the way that these terms are used in Romans 4-5 is very important. If you keep in mind that the OT promise had been that one day the nation would be justified by God and their enemies would be condemned, you can see the basis for salvation from their point of view.

Below, I'm going to replace each use of righteousness or justification with both terms in parentheses (or terms as close to these as seem grammatically reasonable) so that anyone who wishes to can go through the exercise of choosing one term or the other depending on what they are trying to accomplish theologically (that's exactly what the translators did, BTW). If you have the ability to copy and paste this and then print it out it makes for a very interesting exercise.

Romans 4:1-25 (NKJV)
1 What then shall we say that Abraham our father has found according to the flesh?
2 For if Abraham was (made righteous / justified) by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God.
3 For what does the Scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for (righteousness / justification)."
4 Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt.
5 But to him who does not work but believes on Him who (makes righteous / justifies) the ungodly, his faith is accounted for (righteousness / justification),
6 just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes (righteousness / justification) apart from works:
7 "Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven, And whose sins are covered;
8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord shall not impute sin."
9 Does this blessedness then come upon the circumcised only, or upon the uncircumcised also? For we say that faith was accounted to Abraham for (righteousness / justification).
10 How then was it accounted? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised.
11 And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the (righteousness / justification) of the faith which he had while still uncircumcised, that he might be the father of all those who believe, though they are uncircumcised, that (righteousness / justfication) might be imputed to them also,
12 and the father of circumcision to those who not only are of the circumcision, but who also walk in the steps of the faith which our father Abraham had while still uncircumcised.
13 For the promise that he would be the heir of the world was not to Abraham or to his seed through the law, but through the (righteousness / justification) of faith.
14 For if those who are of the law are heirs, faith is made void and the promise made of no effect,
15 because the law brings about wrath; for where there is no law there is no transgression.
16 Therefore it is of faith that it might be according to grace, so that the promise might be sure to all the seed, not only to those who are of the law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all
17 (as it is written, "I have made you a father of many nations") in the presence of Him whom he believed--God, who gives life to the dead and calls those things which do not exist as though they did;
18 who, contrary to hope, in hope believed, so that he became the father of many nations, according to what was spoken, "So shall your descendants be."
19 And not being weak in faith, he did not consider his own body, already dead (since he was about a hundred years old), and the deadness of Sarah's womb.
20 He did not waver at the promise of God through unbelief, but was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God,
21 and being fully convinced that what He had promised He was also able to perform.
22 And therefore "it was accounted to him for (righteousness / justification)."
23 Now it was not written for his sake alone that it was imputed to him,
24 but also for us. It shall be imputed to us who believe in Him who raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead,
25 who was delivered up because of our offenses, and was raised because of our (righteousness / justification).

dwilkins
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: We are saved from WHAT?

Post by dwilkins » Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:31 pm

Romans 5:1-21 (NKJV)
1 Therefore, having been (made righteous / justified) by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,
2 through whom also we have access by faith into this grace in which we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
3 And not only that, but we also glory in tribulations, knowing that tribulation produces perseverance;
4 and perseverance, character; and character, hope.
5 Now hope does not disappoint, because the love of God has been poured out in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who was given to us.
6 For when we were still without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.
7 For scarcely for a (righteous / just) man will one die; yet perhaps for a good man someone would even dare to die.
8 But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.
9 Much more then, having now been (made righteous / justified) by His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through Him.
10 For if when we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved by His life.
11 And not only that, but we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received the reconciliation.
12 Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned--
13 (For until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who had not sinned according to the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.
15 But the free gift is not like the offense. For if by the one man's offense many died, much more the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abounded to many.
16 And the gift is not like that which came through the one who sinned. For the judgment which came from one offense resulted in condemnation, but the free gift which came from many offenses resulted in (righteousness / justification).
17 For if by the one man's offense death reigned through the one, much more those who receive abundance of grace and of the gift of (righteousness / justification) will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ.)
18 Therefore, as through one man's offense judgment came to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one Man's righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in (righteousness / justification) of life.
19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so also by one Man's obedience many will be made (righteous / just).
20 Moreover the law entered that the offense might abound. But where sin abounded, grace abounded much more,
21 so that as sin reigned in death, even so grace might reign through (righteousness / justification) to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

User avatar
Paidion
Posts: 5452
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Back Woods of North-Western Ontario

Re: We are saved from WHAT?

Post by Paidion » Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:43 pm

dseusy wrote:
Paidion wrote:You seem to be saying that no one can be righteous. How then can you receive eternal life?
That is exactly what I am saying. With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.
John who wrote 1 John, believed that it was not only possible to be righteous, but that if you aren't righteous, you are not a child of God:

No one who abides in him keeps on sinning; no one who keeps on sinning has either seen him or known him. Little children, let no one deceive you. Whoever practices righteousness is righteous, as He is righteous. Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil. No one born of God makes a practice of sinning, for God’s seed abides in him, and he cannot keep on sinning because he has been born of God. By this it is evident who are the children of God, and who are the children of the devil: whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is the one who does not love his brother. (1 John 3:6-10 ESV)

John said that whoever practises righteousness IS righteous, not to let anyone deceive me on this point. So I won't. It's a matter of "practising righteousness" and not "practising sinning." Contrary to the Protestant and Fundamentalist "gospel", one doesn't go to hell because one has committed a single sin (or many sins) in the past. One goes to hell because one's nature if sin-sick, self-serving, and rebellious against God. Such a person must be changed, regenerated.The old self-serving person must be destroyed, and the new loving person who serves Christ and his fellow man must come forth. If it takes hell to do it, so be it!

As George MacDonald put it:
Not for any or all of his sins that are past shall a man be condemned; not for the worst of them does he need to fear remaining unforgiven. The sin in which he dwells, the sin of which he will not come out. That sin is the sole ruin of a man. His present live sins, those sins pervading his thoughts and ruling his conduct; the sins he keeps doing, and will not give up; the sins he is called to abandon, but to which he clings instead, the same sins which are the cause of his misery, though he may not know it --- these are the sins for which he is even now condemned.
Ecclesiastes 7:20
Surely there is not a righteous man on earth who does good and never sins.

No one in this forum is arguing against this, nor is anyone of us saying that he/she has never sinned. So to argue that everyone has sinned is attacking a strawman. What you need to try to establish, if I understand your point of view correctly, is that righteousness is unnecessary, that one can live as wicked, self-serving life full of hate and rebellion and still be "saved" through the blood of Christ. Do you really believe the following scenario is a probability on judgment day? Two very evil people, James and George appear before the LORD on that day. Both have raped and torture and murdered. Neither has ever has a revolutionary change in his behaviour. The LORD consults his books. He announces, "James, I see that on February 17, 1990, you accepted Christ as your personal Saviour. Welcome to Heaven! Enter into the joys of the LORD! George, I see that you never did accept Christ. To hell with you! Off to eternal torment." It would be a most serious mistake to think that God cares about whether or not you "accepted Christ" thereby become "positionally righteous." God is not concerned about "positional righteousness"; He is concerned about actual righteousness.

You indicated that my quote of Romans 2;:6-10 is speaking to those under the law. Paul doesn't say that . He says that God will render to EVERYONE according to his works! Not only to those under the law, but to those under the New Covenant:

For He will render to everyone according to his works.

To those who by perseverance in well-doing seek for glory and honour and immortality,
He will give eternal life, but for those who are self-seeking and are not persuaded by the truth,
but are persuaded by unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury.

Affliction and anguish for every person who does evil, but glory and honour and well-being for
every one who does good to the Jew and also the Greek, for God shows no partiality. (Romans 2:6-10)
Romans 3:20-24
"Therefore by the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified in His sight, for by the law is the knowledge of sin. But now the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe. For there is no difference; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus"
The word translated "justified" is simply the verbal form of the noun translated as "righteousness." Sometimes this verb ought to be translated as "made righteous" or (if we need a single word) "righteousified".
So by keeping or attempting to keep the law, no one can be righteous—actually righteous. This REAL righteousness comes only through Christ. This is exactly why Christ died.

He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed. (1 Peter 2:24 ESV)

So yes, all have sinned and come short of the glory of God. But we can be made righteous through the enabling grace made available through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.

Paul wrote to Titus about this enabling grace:

For the grace of God has appeared for the salvation of all people, training us to renounce impiety and worldly passions, and to live sensible, righteous, and devout lives in the present age, expecting the blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of the great God and of our Savior Jesus Christ, who gave himself for us to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own who are zealous for good works. Declare these things; encourage and reprove with all authority. Let no one disregard you. Titus 2:11-15

So the grace of God TRAINS us to renounce impiety and worldly passions, and to live sensible, righteous, and devout lives in the present age. There is a NECESSITY for a change of life style! He said Christ gave Himself to redeem us from what? FROM ALL LAWLESSNESS! To PURIFY for Himself a people who are ZEALOUS FOR GOOD WORKS! This way of life is not optional; it is a requirement for each and everyone.
Jesus said, "Unless you forsake all and follow me, you CANNOT be my disciple." He didn't say that we would be a poor disciple, or a non-functional disciple. He said we couldn't be His disciple AT ALL!
You didn't answer my question, "Do you adhere to all of God's law?"
What do you mean by "God's law"? Are you referring to the Mosaic code? If so, then I unequivocally answer, "NO!"

If by "God' law" you mean the law of Christ as He taught it in Matthew 5, 6, and 7, then I reply that it is my intention to do so. Of course I have not done so perfectly throughout my life. Indeed, I have committed serious sin during part of my life. But as George MacDonald said as quoted above, it is not for past sins that we need fear condemnation, but for our present live sins which we do because of what we are. I have been changed by the grace of God. But I need to coöperate with that grace. I can't become righteous through self-effort. But neither will God sovereignly make me righteous. However, "working together with Him" (2 Corinthians 6:1), I am being changed by Him day by day, so that someday, I will be fully conformed to the image of Christ. I must not accept the grace of God in vain (2 Corinthians 6:1). Thus He who began a good work in me will continue to complete it until the day of Jesus Christ. (Phillipians 1:6). If I continue on the difficult path (or "narrow path") which leads to life, I know I will be pleasing and acceptable to God my Saviour."
Paidion

Man judges a person by his past deeds, and administers penalties for his wrongdoing. God judges a person by his present character, and disciplines him that he may become righteous.

Avatar shows me at 75 years old. I am now 83.

User avatar
Homer
Posts: 2995
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:08 pm

Re: We are saved from WHAT?

Post by Homer » Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:08 pm

Paidion,

You wrote:
Jesus said, "Unless you forsake all and follow me, you CANNOT be my disciple." He didn't say that we would be a poor disciple, or a non-functional disciple. He said we couldn't be His disciple AT ALL!
Additionally you quoted 1 John 3:6-10. Given that you deny Jesus' substitutionary atonement. I, and I suspect others, are confused by how you think a person is justified. As I read your quote of Jesus, I see nothing about perfection. And I see John's statement as being about the normative behavior of a person, not perfection. The word disciple refers to a pupil, a learner. Of coarse in Jesus' time no one could be a student of Jesus without leaving home to follow Him. And there is no question being his disciple meant putting into practice what Jesus taught. Probably the best term for disciple in our day would be "apprentice".

Perhaps a sports analogy will help clear up the fog. Let's say being a Christian in practice is like shooting free throws in basketball. The coach tells his player that he should make his free throws; there is no reason to miss. The player is given instruction and opportunity to practice. Then in the game, the player does his best to make all his free throws. Let's call a missed free throw a sin (missing the mark). Despite his intention and effort, the player misses some of his free throws. Occasionally something distracts him, or he is tired, or he just misses.

Is the player "justified" by:

1. Making all his free throws.

2. Making most of his free throws.

3. Trying to make his free throws although he is a poor free throw shooter and misses more than he makes.

4. None of the above . He tries to make his free throws because of his regard for his coach, team, and interested parties. He is "justified" on another basis.

5. Other?

What do you think?

I do not think anyone here is arguing a person who cares nothing about making free throws is "justified", although I could be mistaken.

Post Reply

Return to “Anthropology, Hamartiology, Soteriology”