Acts 26:32 (closing comment by Agrippa)

Post Reply
User avatar
darinhouston
Posts: 3123
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:45 am

Acts 26:32 (closing comment by Agrippa)

Post by darinhouston » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:55 pm

Acts 26:32 wrote:30 The king stood up and the governor and Bernice, and those who were sitting with them, 31 and when they had gone aside, they began talking to one another, saying, “This man is not doing anything worthy of death or imprisonment.” 32 And Agrippa said to Festus, “This man might have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar.”
We've just concluded a study in Acts in our bible study at church. After Paul pleads his case and makes his sermon to Agrippa, Agrippa makes the above closing comment to Festus. Either I don't understand his point, or it seems like there's a missing word here such as "This man might [not] have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar." Paul was eventually set free, but this sounds like he's saying he might have been set free earlier -- from the reading of the passages, it sounds as if it was precisely the appeal to Caesar that saved Paul in the first place (though remaining captive - sort of)...

Can anyone shed light on this?

User avatar
TK
Posts: 1477
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:42 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Acts 26:32 (closing comment by Agrippa)

Post by TK » Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:24 pm

i thought it meant that agrippa or festus could have NOW set him free, if not for the prior appeal. apparently they couldnt "trump" the appeal that Paul had already made, even if they wanted to do so. i am not sure if Paul could have said "never mind" about the appeal, if he knew that agrippa/festus was willing to let him go.

TK

User avatar
darinhouston
Posts: 3123
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:45 am

Re: Acts 26:32 (closing comment by Agrippa)

Post by darinhouston » Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:39 pm

I see what you're saying - now that I read it with that in mind, I think you're probably right but it does seem a bit odd and anti-climactic to spend these chapters leading up to the "appeal," and then to have him just freed without fanfare when he arrived in Rome after the shipwreck. It's just odd enough that I get the impression there's a teaching point here I'm missing. I guess I'll hit the commentaries -- any ideas on that aspect would be appreciated.

User avatar
Michelle
Posts: 845
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:16 pm

Re: Acts 26:32 (closing comment by Agrippa)

Post by Michelle » Mon Sep 01, 2008 3:09 pm

Wow, Darin, thanks for bringing this up. I had some time this afternoon, and a job I wanted to procrastinate about doing :oops: and this turned out to be an interesting question to look into.

User avatar
darinhouston
Posts: 3123
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:45 am

Re: Acts 26:32 (closing comment by Agrippa)

Post by darinhouston » Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:00 pm

Michelle wrote:Wow, Darin, thanks for bringing this up. I had some time this afternoon, and a job I wanted to procrastinate about doing :oops: and this turned out to be an interesting question to look into.
The anticipation is making me wait.

Post Reply

Return to “Acts & Epistles”