We've just concluded a study in Acts in our bible study at church. After Paul pleads his case and makes his sermon to Agrippa, Agrippa makes the above closing comment to Festus. Either I don't understand his point, or it seems like there's a missing word here such as "This man might [not] have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar." Paul was eventually set free, but this sounds like he's saying he might have been set free earlier -- from the reading of the passages, it sounds as if it was precisely the appeal to Caesar that saved Paul in the first place (though remaining captive - sort of)...Acts 26:32 wrote:30 The king stood up and the governor and Bernice, and those who were sitting with them, 31 and when they had gone aside, they began talking to one another, saying, “This man is not doing anything worthy of death or imprisonment.” 32 And Agrippa said to Festus, “This man might have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar.”
Can anyone shed light on this?