Simon the Zealous? or the Zealot?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 7:11 pm
I am a Pastor, writing a sermon about the apostles. I came to Simon the Zealot, and I'm usually very hesitant to expand that far beyond the Scriptures when looking for helpful information... Thus as the apostle list goes on and on, I have less and less information to include in my sermon about each and every apostle. For example, obviously I could have easily made the sermon all about Peter, but we have less text to go off for Matthew except maybe the call of Levi, or for Thomas except for his time in John 11, and John 20...
Long story short, I of course have looked into a little extra-biblical traditions and such when I came to Simon the Zealot. I read that some people think that Simon was not a "member" of the zealot sect of Judaism, that it may have been just a nickname Jesus gave Him like Jesus gave the Sons of Thunder.
Does anybody have any views about who Simon the zealot is? Just by first thoughts, I could see why some scholars would be rather uncomfortable with him being a part of the zealous sect, so are these scholars view founded on and validated by fact, or by fear and disagreement?
Long story short, I of course have looked into a little extra-biblical traditions and such when I came to Simon the Zealot. I read that some people think that Simon was not a "member" of the zealot sect of Judaism, that it may have been just a nickname Jesus gave Him like Jesus gave the Sons of Thunder.
Does anybody have any views about who Simon the zealot is? Just by first thoughts, I could see why some scholars would be rather uncomfortable with him being a part of the zealous sect, so are these scholars view founded on and validated by fact, or by fear and disagreement?