Do you think He would have called a homosexual union a "marriage"?
Do you see why the definition of "marriage" ought to be preserved?
No and Yes, but what we may disagree about is other then speaking out and exercising our voting power is there anything else to be done?
Search found 1700 matches
- Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:25 am
- Forum: Ethics
- Topic: Outrage @ Outrage
- Replies: 79
- Views: 29784
- Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:19 pm
- Forum: Teachers, Authors, and Movements
- Topic: Benny Hinn
- Replies: 17
- Views: 8011
I used to be an ardent listener of Hank Hannegraff and he could'nt ridicule Benny Hinn enough but then again he ridiculed every WOF minister. Hank played 10-15 year old tapes to persuade his audience and wrote about Hinn among others in "Christianity in Crisis." But the interesting thing about Hinn ...
- Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:06 pm
- Forum: Ethics
- Topic: Outrage @ Outrage
- Replies: 79
- Views: 29784
Since Jesus said, "The sons of this age marry", He must have been using "marry" in a "secular" sense. If so, Jesus must have recognized it as true marriage. Otherwise, He wouldn't have used the words "marry" and "marriage". Paidion, As you know the context of this conversation was Jesus answering t...
- Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:02 pm
- Forum: Ethics
- Topic: Outrage @ Outrage
- Replies: 79
- Views: 29784
The issue is not the sanctity of marriage. The issue is the definition of marriage. When the concept of marriage is extended, then there's no telling where it may go. Some people may insist on group marriage, others on marriage between siblings, or between mother and son, or father and daughter, st...
- Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:26 am
- Forum: Ethics
- Topic: Outrage @ Outrage
- Replies: 79
- Views: 29784
Suppose no one had spoken up or acted, on behalf of the black slaves of America. Caucasian men and women risked their lives to liberate these people. Are we so wimpy today that we will not risk arrest for the sake of the children who are being killed today in the womb ---- especially in the third t...
- Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:13 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Two hours a day of The Narrow Path???
- Replies: 17
- Views: 6922
One drawback is that the second hour will compete with Hank's program, and listeners may not want to miss his program for just another hour of TNP. Also, the money needed to purchase a second hour might better be spent purchasing time on another station. But the advantage may be that there should b...
- Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:51 pm
- Forum: Ethics
- Topic: Backlash over "A Vision for Children"
- Replies: 21
- Views: 9888
my stepdaughter just recently got a job where she can take her child to work with her. God is faithful, and good! What great news! I just wanted to add that i think it's right to expect that God will keep his promises and He did promise to prosper us. I don't think "prosperity" is a dirty word or u...
- Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:27 am
- Forum: Ethics
- Topic: Outrage @ Outrage
- Replies: 79
- Views: 29784
It is imperative for Christians to follow Jesus' commission to make disciples who follow Him in all things, but we fail to love our neighbors as we ought if we wait until the church is perfect before we speak out against moral decay in our society. It's a different thing to speak out in the public ...
- Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:12 pm
- Forum: Ethics
- Topic: Outrage @ Outrage
- Replies: 79
- Views: 29784
Are you unable to distinguish between protesting homosexual "marriage" and attacking homosexuals? Indeed, I am intolerant of extending the definition of marriage to include homosexual unions. Anything wrong with that? Paidion, I can distinguish the difference but the general public can not and we i...
- Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:27 pm
- Forum: Ethics
- Topic: Outrage @ Outrage
- Replies: 79
- Views: 29784
Homer, congrats on 49 years of marriage. I could learn a lot from a man like yourself. How bout congrats to Homer's wife! :D I know one thing which is when Christians get involved with attacking homosexuals the Christians end up looking intolerant. And yes you can say it's a defense of marriage iss...