The Narrow Path Ministries

Today I heard the prayer by representative Cleaver at the US House of Representatives close with "Amen and Awomen' after they had changed from he or she to "them", among other gender things. The politically correct crowd has gone completely nuts! Representative Cleaver, who uttered the words, showe...

Neither does the assertion that the fetus is not a human being. For it is human, and it is a being. It follows that it is a human being. The abortionist might be convinced by that reasoning that it is a human being, but he would then affirm that it is not a "person" until it has been born. One coul...

John clearly taught that He would raise his disciples, not on the day of their death on the LAST DAY. Joh 6:39 And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day. Joh 6:40 For this is the will of my Father, that everyone ...

These paled in comparison to the prophecy Jesus gave about the complete, 7-fold presence of the most wicked of unclean spirits returning to torment that wicked generation in its “last state” (Matt. 12:43-45) Jesus did apply this to "this generation" but did not mention or allude to (as far as i can...

In Matthew 24:21, Jesus said that this greatest of tribulation periods would never again be equaled or surpassed at any time in history AFTER that great tribulation (which would “IMMEDIATELY be followed by Christ’s return). This necessitates that history on this earth would continue to trudge along...

You ask how AD 70’s destruction of Jerusalem could be an “AT HAND” judgment if Revelation was written as early as late AD 59. Well, those “days of vengeance” were not all compressed into a single year. Once those AT HAND “beginning of sorrows” started, they would steadily and inevitably continue to...

I also still wonder why after Jesus clearly described the destruction of Jerusalem in three gospels and in effect said it would happen by about 70AD , why we would need the same event repeated in symbolic language later on and why this description would be called a "Revelation"? The answer to that ...

Don't most Preterists think Revelation was written later in the 60s but that would pose a problem since the Laodicean Church was called "rich" and having wealth but that would be unlikely with an earthquake destruction in 60AD? A reasonable hypothesis, but hardly a given. A rich city could very wel...

Very nice to hear! I don't expect a Dem to repeat that because they would claim it's divisive!