Has either the traditionalist or the Universalist made up their own God to suit their preference? Perhaps we should consider facts in an attempt to arrive at a true picture of God. By "facts" I mean "acts" or "deeds" (Latin factum, i.e., that which has been done). Facts, as it has been said, are stubborn things - they are always true. Pretty difficult to "spin" to fit our paradigm.
As Steve7150 has written:
Here are some points to consider:......there is a fundamental difference between how the two sides view the character of God.
IMHO you view God as vengeful and petty and unmerciful to the vast majority of mankind. ...........Jesus's character was the exact image of God's.
1. Jesus is the exact image of God. Does the God of the Old Testament portray Jesus falsely or is Jesus' character the same as God is shown to be by facts in the Old Testament? (Or did God repent and become a Christian?)
2. It would seem we have more facts about God than we do about Jesus.
3. Many facts about God would seem to better fit with either the eternal punishment or anihilationist view. The flood, Sodom and Gomarrah (anihilationist?), the children of Israel in the desert, the destruction (judging) of entire nations, etc., etc. Doesn't the scripture inform us He never changes?
4. When Israel was taken away into captivity, only a remnant was reconciled. How does this fit with the universalist paradigm? Wouldn't God, as the Universalists see Him, have reconciled them all?
5. When Jesus said "narrow is the path and few there be that find it", did He mean "few" only in a temporary sense or something else? The facts of the Old Testament would support Jesus statement as literal.
6. What facts can the Universalists adduce to support their view of the character of God?
Just some thoughts "off the top of my head.